Re: [Captive-portals] RFC 8952 on Captive Portal Architecture

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Mon, 07 December 2020 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA9B3A0DED for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 16:45:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=pDsUDbPm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=F84xdSj+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8wZPEOW0m_N for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 16:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F3C3A0DE6 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 16:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7B05C018D for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:45:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 19:45:27 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=r3cAPLj4aH14T2qbdoqL5u9Tz+OVn5A vUTCf9+QsiBE=; b=pDsUDbPm1B526CuhmbGfgZxCBgJBm/E8EAiD/kuda4Icei7 55j5+SvQP+Wa5sqedGu2Ro9pdspqS+bI2EiFRJcI3A5qZDCqI+OMfCYMjkjwcABi KNhNj1MyNbT2Eg/0aNX7fIIosNH2rIe7zTbeE1xd5vp5tw9GLsFb980+PelWEYMm sX/UDGA6rVaGURPAIX/pfz7XoGBFChVgI1IB66QRNOuc2qAfMETxcusLOLdhO/HZ i5QhulBq4axj9vNs8ilpkTjgnCWSRZeEjE9sN0wsdqpIMoPOrO//tyocN6ftBGe6 L4MjqNtt8hgHYddfHOIIze33vkwMINU+DMGRf0g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=r3cAPL j4aH14T2qbdoqL5u9Tz+OVn5AvUTCf9+QsiBE=; b=F84xdSj+bnF6uPRdqHyapI HM8DoxR/I3zRkFn78WG38zBCfhI5zVv1GIckboncTCeSWk7Hhm/zl5i6WKCV3gny mT2MH7qwjKtYwKZgkyjNQgXhvCQp1c/bh99S3LxfwqNvrV6hhNbEQSt3QAY01HrK 5Wz71ncNCsfUhTJiaGgFYnGprwYzSKoICSIUJ0UsJ/BhTBZRpbJRkhskMAsJle0i 0qcC6ovpadZdPyxvWvgFovPFjiM2bq9q99eRrlTUsuf9uTa6QyUAjnd8N+gOBOnf 5sRWnhJ3JQc9iEFeLI+q9AaTEGET4byaBx031msW43m1pzddcUlv5z2doo4gRBEg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JnvNX4wRHUnFBZyXsUwkHJfzPGjxXkwV8YeammL6n8uR9saw-HLPsw> <xme:JnvNX8RcKhwIsthkGSykLUv9AhYA5EMRpt0igmxldeNpxud9FX7aQl8FhI1k-xzxo WfaLeYbjd6kpuNX8B0>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudejfedgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeugeejjeffgfduheejgf eftdeigeetjeeghfduvdefgeeuffehleffvefhkeethfenucffohhmrghinheprhhftgdq vgguihhtohhrrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JnvNX6XvcYGTBE3YA4XVVNdmWclYM9gCEvYfrXoueh-hO_dzHUOkHA> <xmx:JnvNX2iz0MHnN9TV3WaXnIaBBFec9G_uABkByI3d6bCjCJbWrNY9-Q> <xmx:JnvNX6CXL9dQtldNkBei_jKHR7PBQVV0ZJX5IX46w-sXfekF42nKAQ> <xmx:J3vNX9OhMYRu6LKKjfoST9xQr6RXvB7iBp994ZFT2FctuYcaEP8nWA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 42AAE200C4; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:45:26 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <92b3aaaa-68a2-4d58-a935-d6815b9be3e1@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201201025124.1C1F3F40719@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20201201025124.1C1F3F40719@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:45:06 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: captive-portals@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/xnViZIDufPZt2qizSSadAoNCEGo>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] RFC 8952 on Captive Portal Architecture
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:45:33 -0000

Hey everyone,

Join me in thanking the editors of the new RFC.  This was good work.

I'll be talking to Barry now about formally closing the group.  We'll leave this list open in case people want to continue to discuss new work on this topic.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, at 13:51, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
>         
>         RFC 8952
> 
>         Title:      Captive Portal Architecture 
>         Author:     K. Larose,
>                     D. Dolson,
>                     H. Liu
>         Status:     Informational
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       November 2020
>         Mailbox:    kyle@agilicus.com, 
>                     ddolson@acm.org, 
>                     liucougar@google.com
>         Pages:      19
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-capport-architecture-10.txt
> 
>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8952
> 
>         DOI:        10.17487/RFC8952
> 
> This document describes a captive portal architecture. Network
> provisioning protocols such as DHCP or Router Advertisements (RAs),
> an optional signaling protocol, and an HTTP API are used to provide
> the solution.
> 
> This document is a product of the Captive Portal Interaction Working 
> Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> Captive-portals@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
>