Re: [Capwap] FW: review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt

["Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[e-mail]>]

Here is what I did with Francis' comments:

>  - the first general question is about references to DHCP:
>   * the whole document, including the Abstract, assumes the reader
>    already knows what is DHCP. I have no concern about this but
perhaps
>    I should? I propose to keep this point closed until someone else
raises it
>    (so it could enter into the any other LC comments)
I did not address this given no one else raised it during LC.

> 
>   * 1.2 (Terminology) is only about CAPWAP, IMHO even you don't abuse
of
>    DHCP specific terms it is a good place to add DHCP references (the
>    three at the beginning of the Security Considerations for
instance).
I added a pointer to RFC 2131 and RFC 3735 in the Terminology section

> 
>  - the second question is about the use (or abuse) of 2119 keywords at
>    unusual places, namely in the Introduction (i.e., before the 2119
>    reference) and in the IANA Considerations. But it is only a
question
>    of usage/style...
Yes, this was addressed

> 
>  - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments  

After figuring out that I have been misspelling the word all this time
(well, maybe I should say I never realized Canadians spelled it
differently from US, even after being here for over 10 years), yes I
fixed it.

PatC
> 
-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:15 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Capwap] FW: review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt

Have Francis' comments been answered? 

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 11:27 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Subject: review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.


Document: draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2008-07-10
IETF LC End Date: 2008-07-14
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready with nits

Comments: I have two general questions and the usual editioral things
(here editorial means they can be handled by the RFC Editor):

 - the first general question is about references to DHCP:
  * the whole document, including the Abstract, assumes the reader
   already knows what is DHCP. I have no concern about this but perhaps
   I should? I propose to keep this point closed until someone else
raises it
   (so it could enter into the any other LC comments)

  * 1.2 (Terminology) is only about CAPWAP, IMHO even you don't abuse of
   DHCP specific terms it is a good place to add DHCP references (the
   three at the beginning of the Security Considerations for instance).

 - the second question is about the use (or abuse) of 2119 keywords at
   unusual places, namely in the Introduction (i.e., before the 2119
   reference) and in the IANA Considerations. But it is only a question
   of usage/style...

 - in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments 

Regards

[e-mail]
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap