[Cats] Use of the CATS WG Github

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 12 October 2023 02:46 UTC

Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Qing An' <anqing.aq@alibaba-inc.com>, 'Peng Liu' <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>, 'cats' <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: cats-chairs@ietf.org
References: <2023101119425249105113@chinamobile.com> <469b5b82-5dc5-4dfa-8d9f-9f166b7c5ba7.anqing.aq@alibaba-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <469b5b82-5dc5-4dfa-8d9f-9f166b7c5ba7.anqing.aq@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 03:46:02 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <055301d9fcb6$3f4defe0$bde9cfa0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0554_01D9FCBE.A1134240"
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: Adn8tje7ztCkRBQCSHWHMqasEKcYmA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cats/BgapJulL4PGE_72iuZ1tt58RGS8>
Subject: [Cats] Use of the CATS WG Github
Precedence: list

To be clear for Qing An’s question and *everybody*

 

The repo is a tool that you are allowed to use but not required to use. It is MAY, not SHOULD or MUST.

It is a choice for the document authors and a personal choice depending on how they like to work.

 

[Hint: You will NEVER see me using Git for any I-D that I edit. I passionately hate it as a tool. :-) ]

 

Three points of reference for you all:

 

1.	Any repo held outside the IETF, is not an IETF repo. (Obvious, huh?). It has no authority. It is just a tool you use. 
2.	When (if) we adopt an I-D into the WG, we could realistically move it to the IETF repo, but that is not a requirement.
3.	Please be sure to keep the WG involved in discussions and decisions made via Git. The hints are:

a.	Discussions and decisions about WG I-Ds MUST be made on the mailing list
b.	If you want people to help with / discuss your individual I-Ds you SHOULD keep them informed via the mailing list
c.	You SHOULD post regular updates to your I-Ds. Don’t just keep updating the text in Git without checkpointing via a new revision in the Datatracker. New revisions of the draft do not need to have major changes. An I-D does not need to be complete.
d.	Please do not set up your repo to spam the mailing list with emails that report all of the changes.

 

Thanks for moving the work forward: I am looking forward to seeing some updated drafts SOON [1]

 

Best,

Adrian

 

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-soon/

 

 

From: Cats <cats-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Qing An
Sent: 12 October 2023 03:17
To: Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>; cats <cats@ietf.org>
Cc: cats-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cats] CATS WG Github

 

Thanks Peng. That's really helpful.

 

As for the Use Case of Computing-Aware AI large model discussed previously (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-an-cats-usecase-ai/), should I make a pull request in the repo? 

 

Regards,

Qing An

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

From:Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com <mailto:liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> >

Send Time:2023年10月11日(星期三) 19:41

To:cats <cats@ietf.org <mailto:cats@ietf.org> >

Cc:cats-chairs@ietf.org <cats-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:cats-chairs@ietf.org> >

Subject:[Cats] CATS WG Github

 

Hi All, 

 

We have the WG github for the WG documents: https://github.com/cats-wg. 

 

The repositories for the draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements is: https://github.com/cats-wg/draft-ietf-cats-usecases-requirements.

 

Authors of the document can use it to refine the draft, we also encourage people to comments on it and sync the updates to the mailinglist. Thanks.

 

Regards,

Peng 


  _____  


liupengyjy@chinamobile.com <mailto:liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>

[Cats] CATS WG Github Peng Liu
Re: [Cats] CATS WG Github Yizhou Li
Re: [Cats] CATS WG Github Qing An
[Cats] Use of the CATS WG Github Adrian Farrel