Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 28 March 2024 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4022CC151096 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uOp7uXkhZHE2 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BB6C14CEFF for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcbf2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4V5Cnp1LwmzDCdb; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:11:42 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <171164864891.48835.15526807176624110008@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:11:31 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <31FCA7E8-0C4D-49C5-983A-5D1C0C9DE449@tzi.org>
References: <171164864891.48835.15526807176624110008@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/2J3bhapA3dff6bl8-9ttcRgLRwE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:11:50 -0000

As discussed at the IETF 119 CBOR meeting and on the mailing list, this is an update that removes .cbordet/.cbordetseq (in favor of .cde/.cdeseq in draft-ietf-cbor-cde).

I did use the opportunity to add a few clarifications/cleanup; see also diff link below [2]:

* References:
  * Added a reference to JSON Sequences (RFC 7464) to the sentence about *not* providing .jsonseq; clarified that sentence
  * Used a single BCP14 reference for the BCP14 boilerplate, to provide a cleaner normative references section
* Removed an unnecessary and potentially confusing “at least”

Note that the shepherd writeup will need to mention the downref to RFC 9285 (base45), which is an informational RFC but a normative reference of this document (for .b45).  
(This is a standard procedure and likely will cause RFC 9285 to be added to the “downref registry” [1].)

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref
[2]: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04


> On 28. Mar 2024, at 18:57, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04.txt is now available. It
> is a work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and
> Extensions (CBOR) WG of the IETF.
> 
>   Title:   More Control Operators for CDDL
>   Author:  Carsten Bormann
>   Name:    draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04.txt
>   Pages:   12
>   Dates:   2024-03-28
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   The Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL), standardized in RFC
>   8610, provides "control operators" as its main language extension
>   point.  RFCs have added to this extension point both in an
>   application-specific and a more general way.
> 
>   The present document defines a number of additional generally
>   applicable control operators for text conversion (Bytes, Integers,
>   JSON, Printf-style formatting) and for an operation on text.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control-04