Re: [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples in drafts under control
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 29 February 2024 11:56 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B28AC14F74E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 03:56:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjPklSJNQXJv for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 03:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55375C14F6FE for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 03:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p548dcbf2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TlqSh2zKnzDCd4; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:56:36 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FD64709D-2B97-4DED-9915-331FE7188EE8@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:56:35 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 730900595.737221-18199cda16fb809eb7a53e4280416cf7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A5B0202-D1C5-46A3-8E31-3987E1445F46@tzi.org>
References: <FD64709D-2B97-4DED-9915-331FE7188EE8@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/FxSN61HDNkJ4fnUlu_jy0ucEN7Q>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples in drafts under control
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:56:45 -0000
On 2024-02-26, at 21:31, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > Should I write an Internet-Draft for this? I did, both for e’’ and ref’’: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-e-ref-00.html (As I mentioned, both are implemented; see the draft for usage and examples.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples in dr… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples i… Wolf McNally
- Re: [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Getting diagnostic notation examples i… Carsten Bormann