IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/cbor-magic-number] WGLC review (#10)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 12 September 2021 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6FA3A20DE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 15:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-sjhMItHyUN for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED1F03A20DD for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 15:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcf6e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.207.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4H74M31m55z2xHt; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:40:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <24784.1631485877@localhost>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:40:31 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 653179230.908525-2634682f577447afbadcb4c60f86ac68
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0CC7F5D5-1E2F-4538-B16D-041B1320C1BE@tzi.org>
References: <cbor-wg/cbor-magic-number/issues/10@github.com> <24784.1631485877@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/MPgY7mlZzwyLXgtaKXvatk0Db4s>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/cbor-magic-number] WGLC review (#10)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 22:40:39 -0000

> 
>> - "Subregistry" RFC 8126 states that the term subregistry was
>> unfortunatly used in the past. I think "CoAP Content-Formats" is a
>> registry in the "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters"
>> group.
> 
> Carsten?

We can switch to the 8126 terminology.

Now https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-magic-number/pull/11

>> - "00000000 d9 d9 f8 da 4f 50 53 4e 43 42 4f 52 |....OPSNCBOR|" I don’t
>> understand where the zeroes come from? Seems like postfix instead of
>> prefix.
> 
> 000000000 is the offset in the file.
> 
>> OLD "Both OpenOffice or MSOffice files" NEW "Both OpenOffice and
>> MSOffice files"
> 
> What's the change?

s/or/and/

> […]
>> OLD "certificate requests" NEW "certification requests" or "certificate
>> signing request"
> 
> RFC7030 calls thems Certificate Signing Requests.

Which is what everyone knows them under.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email