[Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Thu, 27 August 2020 08:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2ED3A0E51; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vql25m3AYMx4; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAD753A0E4C; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:05:24 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: draft-bormann-cbor-packed@ietf.org
CC: cbor@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:05:23 -0700
Message-ID: <008d01d67c48$d25c4440$7714ccc0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AdZ8SHGvHcW3bURCSR6HY4XY2dTJLA==
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/O2cPE3JSjhgaanPAO4JGPxE6RhY>
Subject: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:05:33 -0000
I was just going through an expansion algorithm and I started to wonder if
we should have a requirement about order of items in the prefix table.
Specifically if an entry in the prefix table uses a prefix itself (i.e.
entry 3 in the table is 6.2872("foo")), does that entry need to occur after
the entry it references?
Jim
- [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Brendan Moran
- Re: [Cbor] Ordering of items in the prefix table Michael Richardson