Re: [Cbor] Migrating a spec to structured fields
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 10 March 2021 08:28 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C81A3A1F00 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:28:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8CAXnuBVS4g for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855433A1EFF for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DwQFS2gBXzykc; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:28:12 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <246ddd55-9100-a75b-0137-46aa8df5da77@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:28:11 +0100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 637057691.681538-35b6f202033be7384d66bfb16b013b23
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5348E763-59C6-4ED8-8FA5-386175BB69B8@tzi.org>
References: <CAP9qbHXN+rrvM6ugaaph3ycw2qqEsvO-bPMS=ex6AjNM88xtHw@mail.gmail.com> <246ddd55-9100-a75b-0137-46aa8df5da77@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Or8pQpdljThswXFAlNA0ovwVGRE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Migrating a spec to structured fields
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:28:18 -0000
On 2021-03-10, at 09:15, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > the proposal is to use ABNF Yeah, I was worried about that, too. Instead of using ABNF for JSON texts, we have languages like CDDL. Maybe something should be done now for structured HTTPheaders. (It will be easy to add that to CDDL, if you want.) Grüße, Carsten
- Re: [Cbor] Migrating a spec to structured fields Carsten Bormann