Re: [Cbor] MIME tag 257 vs 36

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 20 September 2020 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824023A0D5F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 12:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qPYVhsEnLmlT for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 12:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06923A0D5E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 12:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.104] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bvctq0GtzzyXP; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <03e801d68f77$297a2800$7c6e7800$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:23:46 +0200
Cc: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 622322626.128407-51cc5f0b626cee2543b596127f608327
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <31F3B345-A983-45BA-BF8E-BEBB3881A13D@tzi.org>
References: <77902B73-54E2-455C-88D3-D9CC62EDD84E@island-resort.com> <4271C433-0B38-4B05-AD44-01830EDBD834@tzi.org> <D4F397FE-79BF-41A5-9B14-3C2D9E7A83FA@island-resort.com> <C4D07067-D855-401F-9EA5-5F11F3896835@island-resort.com> <03e801d68f77$297a2800$7c6e7800$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/S9bHa08jmempsVRqn7cQ97SQkAA>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] MIME tag 257 vs 36
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:23:52 -0000

On 2020-09-20, at 19:54, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't see this as a CBOR problem at all.

I agree.  Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-dispatch-modern-network-unicode-02 for my last year’s attempt to get some progress on the issue.  I got some great feedback and need to submit the -03 based on this feedback.  When a few CBOR drafts are out of the way…

Grüße, Carsten