IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses: tag validity; deterministic encoding

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 08 October 2021 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122CB3A0BCC for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-fjSyO1ooF7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA673A0CBE for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A95A1801B; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:47:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ga48Go4B-aHS; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280CA1800E; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AC572; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:38:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <891995AA-2854-431E-9242-98FFCDA5E161@tzi.org>
References: <891995AA-2854-431E-9242-98FFCDA5E161@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 18:38:44 -0400
Message-ID: <2018.1633732724@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/TT7c0M-6NDWxs8c7H1qXoD_TSpU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses: tag validity; deterministic encoding
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 22:39:14 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > There are various admonitions scattered in
    > draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses about doing the right thing when
    > encoding and decoding the tags.
    > We do have a concept in CBOR to handle this properly:
    > Tag validity (Section 5.3.2 of RFC8949).

    > In response to various observations about those admonitions during IESG processing, I went ahead and consolidated the actual content to a proper section about Tag Validity.

    > https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address/pull/15

I reviewed it, and merged it.

I have posted -11.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email