[Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ?
"Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net> Thu, 30 March 2017 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBE1128BB7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viTLIA-3_hc7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x244.google.com (mail-it0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6285126DCA for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y18so324029itc.2 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=aXWzUTlTEQtrIKbU+XvL0f/yaZxe+Ez7z65VSZrUvUU=; b=SjeW0Qw5nqmmZMcp3ZpS9qH4OFAeeQP+pa7rDx/9E+Oy3bYwQ3wjIBm5H/tUb9cgDD UOAsHU1EgSPWfKTf4acFyxzaWn2GUMXf0opTD3KfpNYWJOE1KFIdrvAW1kVntPx362kO NFyF7JS2UzyFQoQd9/+lF/VcplAK1PLSqm9A+lIIaUgpUZG8ZERvRt7JHUTMJfA1soEm 599bb2HajbumOGyGx8M0kMssp1wc79jGDWPMQC0qCm99SGkhsY5ajC4xZZI4R36ceTde xqS/0N2MkVvTKB+ux9RXtyrucoNjgAlR7LQLbxugUzNAmaNtrhsXaibHQ6Th1/sufH7O FGig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version; bh=aXWzUTlTEQtrIKbU+XvL0f/yaZxe+Ez7z65VSZrUvUU=; b=hfuFfMkBN6UMfd4FrJI6ZbMG2TLAOFJeIgoYR+oj2cLJ/uc6AbtqRMyn4O16De0YlH rQj98s7bQbWiGtOSHD8+cwxWhOjphcQ6dN/gSSacVL/ivEEWSsXs+ulvskKSuIwSfqJ6 0dXIYpQV+Nel1vJKDdcRESZy0ugAKT6ORzsvGes+vVzLmKv1JCG+fgH64PWK4c3okLlU V6bIiJq4WlTBUQzWPugtNtu69f37KQuW2IpXCLHmVcxnaTo8Cu40f+VLt/X3YVcsyfUW 4p6FtJozHCKeKAA2rwbpPi9LLZfCuZIYXtB6ofpbcLeLAwZE83VZfk4q3IynnjvOHBAf Li9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2RHp05nwLy5uVWypTFrerBbA7lTJtfLnDvvwqplEPMuck2gk3aXEZG3WzmYeZx9g==
X-Received: by 10.36.33.68 with SMTP id e65mr321784ita.21.1490908800795; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:c481:a91e:37c6:2f8d? (t2001067c03700128c481a91e37c62f8d.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:c481:a91e:37c6:2f8d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm2040262iod.33.2017.03.30.14.20.00 for <cbor@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Matthew Miller <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
To: cbor@ietf.org
From: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>
Message-ID: <a5645c38-a256-0182-73bc-507f7b884a27@outer-planes.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:19:59 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X8eseiND7Mctkb8kMRTiFAbF5eDJSGEks"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/V_WKb-i8wdIPRumzGUqanhAAwbA>
Subject: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ?
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:20:05 -0000
As mentioned in the face-to-face meeting, the WG might want to consider a different name before adopting draft-greevenbosch-appsawg-cbor-cddl. I offer a number of suggestions: * Language Describing CBOR Data * CBOR Description Format * CBOR Data Description Format I tried a couple of quick searches across Bing/DuckDuckGo/Google/Yahoo, and none of the results -- to me -- seemed ripe for confusion by the users of CBOR. -- - m&m Matthew A. Miller
- [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Matthew A. Miller
- Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ? Leif Hedstrom