IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-control-05

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Wed, 22 September 2021 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D25A3A0045; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NefjwiVd8XLL; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prometheus.amsuess.com (prometheus.amsuess.com [5.9.147.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58403A003D; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (095129206250.cust.akis.net [95.129.206.250]) by prometheus.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45BD641695; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bf]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA16D7; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:28:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:f7e1:97ee:3bc5:7d44]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A461A1; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:28:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 1656402 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:28:25 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:28:25 +0200
From: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-control.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <YUt1yVXwzqckMZtJ@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <163177805091.20542.1431332039721128802@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9Meb3Dc+6HLFJJDm"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <163177805091.20542.1431332039721128802@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/XNrkXwstigXGDq8aBJQ1xgcwdF8>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-control-05
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:28:47 -0000

Hello Tianran, hello Carsten,

thank you for your input on this document.

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:40:50AM -0700, Tianran Zhou via Datatracker wrote:
> I do not think "an extension registry that's only "specification required""
> should be the reason for informaitonal.

this point was discussed in today's CBOR interim meeting, and
considering this thread, input from the interim including from Francesca
as responsible AD, we chairs agree that this can be moved to standards
track without the need for further discussion.

Carsten, please switch the document over to standards track with your
next upload (and poke me if I don't update my shepherd review to reflect
the changed situation right after that).

Best regards
Christian

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email