[Cbor] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-11: (with COMMENT)

[Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

NITS:

TAI is never expanded - expand on first use? At least for me this was a new
term, unlike UTC. But perhaps it is obvious for implementers in this space.

        The present document

Use "This document"

        therefore is rendered by the surrogate notation seen here in the
        plain-text rendition.

"here" is a bit weird when I'm reading the HTML version. Can't you just write
2^xx as an example ?

        The security considerations of RFC 8949 apply

A link is missing here.