[Cbor] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 26 October 2023 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCE0C14CF05; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, barryleiba@computer.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 11.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <169830227782.35150.18313222083530442589@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:37:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/fYIVXo4ALr0_VZsWSheDzpTG2nE>
Subject: [Cbor] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 06:37:57 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-11: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 7.2 establishes a new IANA registry using "a combination of "Expert
Review" and "RFC Required" as the Registration Procedure".  How are they
combined?  Is it either-or?  Do different ranges have different policies?  Does
the applicant get to choose?  Does the designated expert get to choose?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Thomas Fossati for the ARTART review.