IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag for RFC 3339 full-date values

"Richter, Jörg" <Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de> Wed, 04 March 2020 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C730B3A040F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 23:43:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UaC90A7Uw_AZ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 23:43:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pdv-fs.de (mail.pdv-fs.de [213.208.220.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BBF3A0404 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 23:43:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pdv-fs.de (unknown [192.168.180.95]) by mail.pdv-fs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:42:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EXCHDB1.pdv-fs.de (192.168.180.94) by EXCHDB2.pdv-fs.de (192.168.180.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:42:56 +0100
Received: from EXCHDB1.pdv-fs.de ([fe80::6c4a:8b1b:60f4:4437]) by EXCHDB1.pdv-fs.de ([fe80::6c4a:8b1b:60f4:4437%15]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.009; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:42:56 +0100
From: "Richter, Jörg" <Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [Cbor] CBOR tag for RFC 3339 full-date values
Thread-Index: AQHV8a0B9fEeIB5RW0GE31JPZx9/XKg3arYAgACfx6g=
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:42:56 +0000
Message-ID: <282209381d8b4a8b8e77515142266df2@pdv-FS.de>
References: <CH2PR00MB0679818FABC93C37FF88A404F5E40@CH2PR00MB0679.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>, <AB18584F-BA25-464E-8DEC-217067D7643E@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <AB18584F-BA25-464E-8DEC-217067D7643E@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.185.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TMASE-Version: DDEI-3.5-8.5.1020-25268.005
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.992300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: j6N+ovIINR+n9EJj6muJHmCpu+NlpSDeou859sScIYpVTaZPGOkL02sG JiZSQICbnyMABw4V8Tjs0O7ms5ITYJydwblx2XNga8NP7ALumoVKRaXN2yYjHk+86maMM3aSCSq vzMGx6vEynIT+kqhg23Dt0CnaGnwb7ABo0upccSowo+sXt0rns5hwKdlCfPk8myiLZetSf8mXxk CsDPSYDDtQWIXrdOEn0C1sQRfQzEHEQdG7H66TyOP/mA9rOmnf9G84N7/KGEDzBM0a4skz04v8l DOGQCUyAj9RatMxYL2dKeYKkuyC7fK+VXpen3rZyYdBFCQZXYT6qyQImjI5YPwvmYdMOvkKp5DF xO/tuzWUSSJPERKCCG1G0sdA2yd47FHW4PQA8ke6rLuaBPjT2g==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
X-TMASE-INERTIA: 1-0;;J4gzHMCxkPyYUJl0x8cA1w==;;
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/iIxSyXHKFcLGUrIAh_rf-zepEXg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag for RFC 3339 full-date values
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:43:04 -0000

Hi,

> The need for a date (not time) tag has come up before; I just can’t remember where.

One year ago I sent a proposal für a date tag [1].
So far it has not made it into the overview of the assigned CBOR-tags [2].

I would very much appreciate if the suggested tag number is used for the date-tag, since we already use it internally.

What is missing for the suggested tag numbers to be assigned? Btw. I have another proposal for currencies and money amounts at [3] whose tags were not assigned either.

- Jörg

[1] https://j-richter.github.io/CBOR/date.html
[2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags/cbor-tags.xhtml
[3] https://j-richter.github.io/CBOR/currency.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email