IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-00.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 02 August 2020 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506303A0919 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 23:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYVh-c2rSC1B for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 23:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087613A094B for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.101] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BKBH86r3bzysQ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:40:52 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <72e2157f-3915-542d-3b1e-2ef89b972cfe@seantek.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 08:40:52 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 618043252.51878-6695f7a214818291d0fffe7b4eabc526
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3CB26038-56EC-43A9-A4EF-7FF89E36FFA0@tzi.org>
References: <87h7tmxnxq.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <72e2157f-3915-542d-3b1e-2ef89b972cfe@seantek.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/iVIMZ9HCPmHD8vCii08jT52yDro>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-00.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 06:40:57 -0000

On 2020-08-02, at 08:22, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:
> 
> The byte 0x80 *never* appears in an OID or Relative-OID ("ROID"). 

Huh?

1.2.3.16384 == h’2a 03 81 80 00’

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email