Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-03.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 26 March 2021 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695993A1121 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9TTcUVWfNbg for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E733A111E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92687389EF for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VWMCY1t_acS2 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:21:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A061389EA for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:21:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD23C65 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:15:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <161671721287.32724.17231183596523012671@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <161671721287.32724.17231183596523012671@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:15:42 -0400
Message-ID: <29354.1616717742@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/k7vFEPcp97qg-M7j18n0zSBrwmM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-03.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:15:49 -0000

internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    > This draft is a work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF.

    > Title           : CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes
    > Author          : Michael Richardson
    > Filename        : draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-03.txt
    > Pages           : 6
    > Date            : 2021-03-25

    > Abstract:
    > This document describes two CBOR Tags to be used with IPv4 and IPv6
    > addresses and prefixes.

    > RFC-EDITOR-please remove: This work is tracked at
    > https://github.com/mcr/cbor-network-address.git

    > A diff from the previous version is available at:
    > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-03

This update includes "early", Designated Expert/FCFS allocation for the TBD1
and TBD2.   Perhaps a SecDir review and WGLC.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide