IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Review of draft-ietf-cbor-packed-02

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 16 March 2021 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC7F3A206C for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 02:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sxJ0BYPsgYm for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 02:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686BF3A206A for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 02:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F07gL71Knzycq; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:45:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <94F95A0D-4EAF-4015-8EBA-55A705193F6F@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:45:02 +0100
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 637580702.224267-4ddde4f1f9ddc146b93539e112d49b03
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DCE8C138-255D-4B2C-826C-7664D6342BFC@tzi.org>
References: <3835E637-85A1-44B3-812D-FD6A80EE8473@vigilsec.com> <08DB2CF6-21D7-4EE6-85C7-1E73416D1A70@tzi.org> <0C959B3D-462F-4872-A8AA-12F9C90FD425@vigilsec.com> <7BB8857D-1212-4AD7-B3E7-0416C8248290@tzi.org> <94F95A0D-4EAF-4015-8EBA-55A705193F6F@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/kugwWUNFb3FeeQ7wBby5shoTzjg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Review of draft-ietf-cbor-packed-02
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:45:10 -0000

On 2021-03-15, at 23:18, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Should there be an explicit identifier of the predefined starting point for the tables?

I’m a bit dense today and don’t understand that question.
Can you -v?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email