Re: [Cbor] Reminder: bi-weekly CBOR conference call on 21 April

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 21 April 2021 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CE93A22F3 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kp7qIPrKAP73 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D0F3A22D3 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcb12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FQJzF22Hgz14Nd; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:00:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK+ciZRDrtyYb5PSfcG1s=uzEAXkAvdEPpnMaFUwMEb7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:00:40 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 640699240.86577-72034df3f0fc9e6b75fc18bd5b537674
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5BBC74D5-C39B-4FAF-A3C5-43B20430F7D2@tzi.org>
References: <CALaySJK+ciZRDrtyYb5PSfcG1s=uzEAXkAvdEPpnMaFUwMEb7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/lJzldJfScL2VziMImWnGMAypDUE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Reminder: bi-weekly CBOR conference call on 21 April
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:00:49 -0000

Hi Barry,

On 2021-04-20, at 18:03, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
> In particular, see the agenda here:
> https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-interim-2021-cbor-07-cbor?view

I think we want to discuss the errata reports 6527 and 6543.
I have written text for those in 

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-freezer-07.html#name-clarifications

(Submitted a small editorial update today on the ABNF.)

We should check
* that we agree on the resolutions proposed;
* agree whether and how to handle this in the errata reporting process and/or somewhere else.

If the “clarifications” part of the freezer document starts to grow, this might take up a role similar to that of draft-ietf-rohc-rtp-impl-guide which ultimately became RFC 4815 [1] (except that we probably want to rev 8610 instead).

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4815/