IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-update-8610-grammar-00.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 09 March 2023 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF60C15171E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:58:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OanyyBCpH3y8 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5916BC1516EA for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 09:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PXcP56M0PzDCbq; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 18:58:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 18:58:33 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 700077513.444476-ffd48e637307f0268bc324c458b7a2bc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4EB12FD4-70E7-4BA3-B98C-71FB32B82A2F@tzi.org>
References: <167838456834.65408.12570826443749447545@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/nJDYRNVM2J4ydWBhCFd9vU5i3kM>
Subject: [Cbor] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-update-8610-grammar-00.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 17:58:42 -0000

As discussed yesterday, I have started extracting the content for the CDDL update drafts that we are planning.  This one addresses the grammar fixes.  It should be ready for working group adoption (and WGLC, if you ask me).

Grüße, Carsten


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-update-8610-grammar-00.txt
> Date: 2023-03-09 at 18:56:08 CET
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i-d-announce/mg-yej2W0k1opVSaI0LqggE26mo>
> Message-Id: <167838456834.65408.12570826443749447545@ietfa.amsl.com>
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 
>        Title           : Updates to the CDDL grammar of RFC 8610
>        Author          : Carsten Bormann
>  Filename        : draft-bormann-cbor-update-8610-grammar-00.txt
>  Pages           : 12
>  Date            : 2023-03-09
> 
> Abstract:
>   At the time of writing, the Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL)
>   is defined by RFC 8610 and RFC 9165.  The latter has used the
>   extension point provided in RFC 8610, the _control operator_.
> 
>   As CDDL is being used in larger projects, the need for corrections
>   and additional features has become known that cannot be easily mapped
>   into this single extension point.  Hence, there is a need for
>   evolution of the base CDDL specification itself.
> 
>   The present document updates errata and makes other small fixes for
>   the ABNF grammar defined for CDDL in RFC 8610.
> 
> 
>   // Previous versions of the changes in this document were part of
>   // draft-bormann-cbor-cddl-2-draft and previously draft-bormann-cbor-
>   // cddl-freezer.  This submission extracts out those grammar changes
>   // that are ready for WG adoption and publication.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email