Re: [Cbor] Charter update
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 May 2019 23:20 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF9A12036D for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qgiJFXcrjqh for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C217120353 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6CC75.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.204.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 454nT24NDNzyQp; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <032801d50c37$4b8a3120$e29e9360$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 01:20:06 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 579741603.71223-af9989bccd29b71dc6a58f4f9a250edc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DD06B37-5EF4-40A1-B14D-C44D5F0C995A@tzi.org>
References: <032801d50c37$4b8a3120$e29e9360$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/vnten707ZEMS0nkDaeYcy8x5eus>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Charter update
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 23:20:17 -0000
Hi Jim, thank you (the chairs) for taking this initiative. I still have to read the whole thing, but I already experience one heavy knee jerk: > On May 17, 2019, at 00:32, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > > extensions to CBOR types I don’t think we should say that we are “extending” CBOR… Yes, we are exercising its extensibility points, but the result are new (or updated) CBOR Tags, not really extensions to CBOR itself. (I’m trying separate CBOR the standard from the greater CBOR ecosystem, which includes the Tag definitions.) (We *are* extending CDDL. I hope.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Cbor] Charter update Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cbor] Charter update Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Charter update Jim Schaad