Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03.txt
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 17 November 2020 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9C43A0954 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YIe6dAytd7lt for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742003A091C for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.120] (p548dcb31.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CbHpy3WwMzyQn; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:39:06 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <160564516394.23772.979331601036599508@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:39:06 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 627338345.781951-7a8404753543c0f96519e461d0c3cc68
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7D41C1C-72C9-4E11-A6DC-AEA97B1D503C@tzi.org>
References: <160564516394.23772.979331601036599508@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/zs-MR1ionzzjEbMeiNWQOBUs69M>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:39:11 -0000
To make some progress on tags-oid, I addressed issues 6 and 7. Please comment on text and technical content. Issue 5 could be closed (amazingly, there is nothing to fix, and this will be removed before publication anyway). I didn’t tackle issue 3 yet: I haven’t seen any feedback on it: https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/issues/3 The control suggested in the issue seems to a no-brainer, but we need to check the name and see whether we need any other CDDL control operators (which we *could* also define later, of course). Maybe we want a cross of .cat and .minus (which doesn’t exist yet, either) instead? Enjoy! Best before Thursday’s CBOR meeting... Grüße, Carsten > On 2020-11-17, at 21:32, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF. > > Title : Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers > Authors : Carsten Bormann > Sean Leonard > Filename : draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2020-11-17 > > Abstract: > The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, draft-ietf-cbor- > 7049bis) is a data format whose design goals include the possibility > of extremely small code size, fairly small message size, and > extensibility without the need for version negotiation. > > The present document defines CBOR tags for object identifiers (OIDs). > It is intended as the reference document for the IANA registration of > the CBOR tags so defined. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > CBOR mailing list > CBOR@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
- [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-03.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-0… Carsten Bormann