Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B412120052 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_sKsB_UA3fg for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150090.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1180120110 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QiHQpQ9tTs/veGUjyjWELLNZP/e1b5MEDmKPzCKyNUY=; b=KwSCPYTlDMx9B57HAmvdrtDWRXpKdV3M+/9I/A2Ex92I2TP4K8qm7mQCiEcf4KDqPapWoj46GC00HqilSmM793M0Opxc0F2d3RViyYnFh9u+K50s104x7YNTKvq5XCNQvCGAcqXDRchmNt0fxi7nuuK8fsKxBACYSaCPrKlOMNo=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.46.212) by DB7PR07MB4684.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.141.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.6; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:34:28 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65]) by DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.007; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:34:28 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>
CC: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
Thread-Index: AQHU6UkERQOX+/KNVE2BJi+xNHWYgg==
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:34:28 +0000
Message-ID: <014401d4e971$8e2a4c60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <VI1PR07MB50409E6F464C786A9CCAE608F0550@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <091501d4e948$a188c800$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7701_1554213204_5CA36954_7701_2_7_ffc8ad41-1454-0a3e-dcf3-633f03bd451b@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0439.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:e::19) To DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:7b::20)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.215.234]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8fa42f80-3484-4926-98a3-08d6b7891354
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB4684;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4684:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB46848DBFA1A07B3EF725A8BFA0560@DB7PR07MB4684.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0995196AA2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(4326008)(4720700003)(84392002)(305945005)(86362001)(7736002)(256004)(6916009)(71190400001)(229853002)(53936002)(97736004)(486006)(52116002)(81816011)(76176011)(71200400001)(81686011)(61296003)(105586002)(106356001)(476003)(2351001)(446003)(26005)(102836004)(53546011)(6506007)(386003)(186003)(86152003)(8936002)(5640700003)(3846002)(6116002)(66066001)(68736007)(6246003)(81166006)(81156014)(44736005)(6486002)(25786009)(50226002)(1556002)(2501003)(14454004)(9686003)(6436002)(6512007)(8676002)(14496001)(316002)(2906002)(62236002)(44716002)(5660300002)(99286004)(478600001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB4684; H:DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: NbyTb+EEq/0O3RWNFH2ZH2CEAotsxxXgjvY2hrpvxc/SoPenpMWGiOBZF4kU8k2Di93umlpuGgedUlevJtl8DbXCOALMsrGDv7K3EqQUWT+nxN2+N5FqOGwyf7nGieT3z9XA4iAbNry+sYXnwF+V19bEJG52bZRkfAcmyLXyVnaqrxKkR9u/bSt10yFo6HKvxM3HRKtZmV7iH+NQYhdzldzSAIFP/3SGbhl13b/YeTO9JOJlESW6KBSj1ggpQK4Ib984jnwqBaOB3a/DfAJwORkxqryKHzjJzADbFr8ojKJiNl4vebuEl6kxe248U8Sy8arR6bOePzPdlbM/GeBGkdxaCl2MaHXBVKxyt/axKNVYksXQEvkFsMMCHCn/Q1zd0balOAtRi6sh+MT76XgV01fIZLruwdsuwBsKQ9+S4VA=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F91A35B55343AB4ABFCB41E3182FA43C@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8fa42f80-3484-4926-98a3-08d6b7891354
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Apr 2019 16:34:28.4549 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4684
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/-VPkjl1D5kKtZpDdN4apXVaASms>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:34:33 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: <julien.meuric@orange.com>;
To: "tom petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>;
Cc: <ccamp@ietf.org>;
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2019 2:53 PM

> Hi Tom,
>
> Though it may be true from a content perspective, any individual draft
> has the same administrative status as draft-foo-bar containing a
stuffed
> snails recipe. A formal step is required before liaising to another
SDO,
> adoption by a WG is the 1st one.

Indeed (tasty as stuffed snails are).

My thinking is that the liaison should be simpler, plain text, rather
than being wrapped as a YANG module, which may or may not encourage
readers in the ITU.  It seems to me that it is Section 2.3.1 that needs
a response from the ITU and that wrapping that up in a YANG module may
make that harder to achieve.  That is what gives me pause.

Tom Petch

> Cheers,
>
> Julien
>
>
> On 02/04/2019 13:41, tom petch wrote:
> > I never see much difference between working on an unadopted I-D and
an
> > adopted one so see scope for progress - e.g. Normative References -
even
> > if it is not adopted at this moment in time..
>
>
>