Re: Basic agenda structure for Washington DC
Tomohiro Otani <otani@kddilabs.jp> Mon, 25 October 2004 12:54 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA22183 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM4aN-0005yl-AS for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:08:32 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CM4CY-0007J4-8r for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:43:54 +0000
Received: from [192.26.91.6] (helo=mandala.kddilabs.jp) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CM4CX-0007IR-36 for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:43:53 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE0AEC8B8; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:43:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from platinum.onw.kddilabs.jp (platinum.onw.kddilabs.jp [2001:200:601:1300:172:19:83:254]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62CEC8AA; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:43:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:200:601:1e02:0:5efe:ac13:5715] (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:601:1e02:0:5efe:ac13:5715]) by platinum.onw.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D62578103; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:39:18 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <417CF50F.1030702@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:43:59 +0900
From: Tomohiro Otani <otani@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja-JP; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Basic agenda structure for Washington DC
References: <5.1.1.9.2.20041025204501.0524ad08@imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.9.2.20041025204501.0524ad08@imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf3becbbd6d1a45acbe2ffd4ab88bdc2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi everyone, We have updated the GMPLS inter-AS TE document, following the discussion in the last IETF meeting. /http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otani-ccamp-interas-gmpls-te-01.txt/ We welcome your comments and feedback until the meeting as well as in the meeting. With best regards, tomo ---------------------------------------------- Tomo Otani KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc. > >We have updated two documents related to L1VPNs, and would like to discuss >them as part of L1VPN slot in the proposed basic agenda. > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-02.txt >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-01.txt >(should be available soon) > >Also : >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ouldbrahim-ppvpn-gvpn-bgpgmpls-05.txt >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-overlay-05.txt > > >For information, here is status update. > >o Framework ID: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-02.txt > - Terminology refinement (section 2 and throughout the document) > - Security considerations (section 9) > - Further clarification on service models (sections 7.2 and 7.3) > >o Applicability ID: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-01.txt >(should be available soon) > - Addition of a new co-author (Deborah Brungard) > - Itemization and preliminary analysis of several alternatives (if any) >as guidelines for filling the gap between existing GMPLS and required >functions for L1VPNs > - Addition of network usage of L1VPN service models as additional >information (appendix) > - Addition of security management (section 8.3) > - Merge of "Overlay Service Model" and "Overlay Extension Service >Model" (section 6) > >Comments are highly appreciated. > >At 12:11 04/10/08 +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>Hi, >> >>Since San Diego, we have managed to move on quite well with our existing >>milestones, >>commitments and drafts. >> >>So, the basic agenda structure for Washington DC is as follows: >> >>Admin and WG status >>ASON Solutions >>Protection solutions >>Inter-domain >> Basic >> MRN >> Diverse path >>New work >> MPLS/GMPLS migration >> L1VPN >> Others >>Rechartering >> >>If you would like a slot, please ask and we will attempt to construct an agenda. >>Editors/authors or WG drafts may expect to be asked by the chairs to >>present on the >>status, issues and next steps for their drafts. >> >>Thanks, >>Adrian > >----- >Tomonori TAKEDA >NTT Network Service Systems Lab. >Phone: +81-422-59-7434 > > > > >
- Basic agenda structure for Washington DC Adrian Farrel
- Re: Basic agenda structure for Washington DC Tomonori TAKEDA
- Re: Basic agenda structure for Washington DC Tomohiro Otani
- Re: Basic agenda structure for Washington DC Kohei Shiomoto