Re: Vancouver agenda

[Sugang XU <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian,

We have updated our draft. If possible, I would also ask a small time 
slot to present the appended signaling issues in our I-D.

Thank you very much,

Sugang

Greg Bernstein wrote:

> Hi Adrian, there seems to be some interest in the wavelength switched 
> optical stuff. There should be:
> (a) framework discussion/draft (we've updated and would like this to be 
> a working group draft)
> (b) label format (I was hoping Otani et. al. would be updating their draft)
> (c) signaling discussions (I've just submitted a draft and last time 
> Xu/King had a draft)
> (d) information for RWA (I'll be submitting this shortly, its 
> independent of how we distribute it, e.g., an IGP or some other method)
> 
> Hence this would make a moderately "chunky" session or sub-session.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Greg B.
> 
> Adrian Farrel wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have again requested two meetings for Vancouver (although the 
>> Secretariat appears to have allocated three!).
>>
>> So we need to start building our agenda.
>>
>> We want to have some chunky sessions to discuss
>> - The progress with GELS
>> - Issues and developments for distribution of TE information
>>   from outside ASes
>>   See
>>   -  Mach's I-Ds for inter-AS TE links
>>   - Yakov/Don's I-D for BGP-TE
>>   - JP's (expired?) proposal for CE-PE TE link advertisement
>>      in BGP
>>
>> What else would you like to see on the agenda?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian (per pro Deborah)
>>
>>
>>
>