CCAMP ASON requirements drafts ready for IESG
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 14 October 2004 08:33 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA19011 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:33:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI1Eh-0004QK-NX for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:45:25 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CI0u8-000CvF-AL for ccamp-data@psg.com; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:24:08 +0000
Received: from [80.168.70.142] (helo=relay2.mail.uk.clara.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CI0u7-000Cup-Ah; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:24:07 +0000
Received: from du-069-0232.access.clara.net ([217.158.132.232] helo=Puppy) by relay2.mail.uk.clara.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CI0u6-000Dz9-AT; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:24:06 +0100
Message-ID: <06cf01c4b1c7$3ac73ac0$21849ed9@Puppy>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: zinin@psg.com
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: CCAMP ASON requirements drafts ready for IESG
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:23:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Alex, The two ASON requirements drafts (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-reqts and draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-reqts) have just been republished. These revisions contain updates to address the comments raised by AD review and I have checked that the points have been correctly addressed. The revisions also contain updates to handle the concerns raised in San Diego that the drafts did not adequately handle the ITU-T issue of "subnetwork opacity". Can you please put these two drafts on your list to take to the IESG. Thanks, Adrian
- CCAMP ASON requirements drafts ready for IESG Adrian Farrel
- Re: CCAMP ASON requirements drafts ready for IESG Alex Zinin