Re: [CCAMP] draft-margaria-ccamp-label-set-ero-00?
Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es> Sat, 31 March 2012 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9E21F8472 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id am++4m9ZgDx9 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Scorpius.cttc.es (scorpius.cttc.es [84.88.62.197]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DB421F845C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from castor (postfix@castor.cttc.es [84.88.62.196]) by Scorpius.cttc.es (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q2V7Rcxd002503 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:27:43 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (62.57.44.55.dyn.user.ono.com [62.57.44.55]) by castor (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACF72FC250 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F76B1F5.6090202@cttc.es>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:27:49 +0200
From: Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccamp@ietf.org
References: <4F7074CB.5080509@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F7074CB.5080509@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (castor); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 84.88.62.197
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-margaria-ccamp-label-set-ero-00?
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:28:01 -0000
El 26/03/2012 15:53, Lou Berger escribió: > So, is there any interest in the function described in this document? > Lou, all (note: speaking as a co-author) Yes I think the proposed function is interesting: - Extend explicit label control to a set (>1) of labels, notably in constrained environments such as D-WA in transparent segments - Enable exclusive-explicit label control - More efficient encodings when including / excluding labels e.g. in IRO/XRO (although secondarily and subject to PCE-wg opinion following Julien's guidelinets) thanks Ramon
- [CCAMP] draft-margaria-ccamp-label-set-ero-00? Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] draft-margaria-ccamp-label-set-ero-00? Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] draft-margaria-ccamp-label-set-ero-00? Ramon Casellas