IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Discussion on "Optical Interface Parameters" drafts

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Tue, 27 October 2015 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903481ACD3B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Nn0u7flcXF5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724481ACD26 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9812; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445967317; x=1447176917; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Bqt/XZsLgVeyC7Z1D3lxXoUTo+7rnHJR1fjjSNfXukU=; b=cY8/eS8fO5xUrO04X1sFA6zoEhYUTivxjflvJaUCt9YwX/St34HKkNxx dTkYQfeHnHaeyYcRBCCn8xlXAGfsNHONnnFoO29i9DD6/z107EIFmlZwG eoDSY/3e5XxtHvcgQjwvoxt1Swvg7fAP4r0D5mdMg9DJFe5nHzJA4KAKB o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D5AQCmtC9W/4UNJK1egmlNVG8GvwEBDYFaIYV5AoFBOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEMgEBAQQtXAIBCBEDAQIoBzIUCQgBAQQBEogwDcVuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARqGd4R+hGkTGIQuBY1SiGYBhRuICIIhmhABEQ4BAUKEBHIBhGeBBgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,206,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="45223001"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Oct 2015 17:35:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (xch-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9RHZFhF019028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:35:15 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:34:51 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com ([173.37.102.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:34:51 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "dharinih@juniper.net" <dharinih@juniper.net>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>, "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>, "RKunze@telekom.de" <RKunze@telekom.de>, Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: Discussion on "Optical Interface Parameters" drafts
Thread-Index: AdEQm4atKsi36XaVTliLEqft+d3EkAASrDSA
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:34:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D2552B45.15208D%zali@cisco.com>
References: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CCFD1E1@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CCFD1E1@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.89.10.50]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2552B4515208Dzaliciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/3mIztPw5WLRqtv7IKTn4jEv_ayg>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Discussion on "Optical Interface Parameters" drafts
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:35:36 -0000

Folks-

I am unable to travel for this IETF - sorry will miss it.

Thanks

Regards ... Zafar

From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com<mailto:zhangfatai@huawei.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 5:40 AM
To: "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>, "dharinih@juniper.net<mailto:dharinih@juniper.net>" <dharinih@juniper.net<mailto:dharinih@juniper.net>>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net<mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net>>, "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com<mailto:ggalimbe@cisco.com>>, zali <zali@cisco.com<mailto:zali@cisco.com>>, "RKunze@telekom.de<mailto:RKunze@telekom.de>" <RKunze@telekom.de<mailto:RKunze@telekom.de>>, Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>>
Subject: Discussion on "Optical Interface Parameters" drafts

Hi authors and CCAMPers,

There are a couple of drafts on "Optical Interface Parameters", such as draft-kdkgall-ccamp-dwdm-if-mng-ctrl-fwk-01, draft-galikunze-ccamp-dwdm-if-snmp-mib-00,
draft-dharini-netmod-dwdm-if-yang-00, draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dharinigert-ccamp-dwdm-if-lmp-00.txt>.

I would like to trigger some discussion on these drafts before they will be presented in Yokohama meeting, because there is no any discussion on this topic since the last IETF meeting.

After I reviewed these drafts, it seems to me the major change is that the title of these drafts has been changed from "G.698.2..." to "Optical Interface Parameters", but the content in these drafts is still almost the same as before(even though LMP use case was moved from LMP draft to the FWK draft). Probably, I missed something important.

In Prague meeting, I think the consensus from the floor is to make the "content" (rather than only "title") much more generic, i.e., beyond of g.698.2.

Therefore, could you clarify what changes have been made to make things generic to reflect the discussion in Prague meeting?


Best Regards

Fatai

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email