Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability
wang.qilei@zte.com.cn Fri, 06 May 2022 01:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0FC15949E; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIw3vtrhwcDU; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A590C14F744; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxlzmapp06.zte.com.cn ([10.5.230.252]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 246102Sp022875; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.qilei@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (szxlzmapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid16; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b03627473250ac-bf49d
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202205060900212890011@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <000101d860c7$d3f02a00$7bd07e00$@olddog.co.uk>
References: 000101d860c7$d3f02a00$7bd07e00$@olddog.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wang.qilei@zte.com.cn
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, rvaliveti@infinera.com, zhenghaomian@huawei.com, huubatwork@gmail.com, sergio.belotti@nokia.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 246102Sp022875
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 62747340.002 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1651798848/4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk/62747340.002/10.30.14.239/[10.30.14.239]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 62747340.002/4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/4aukjkXJacNaQNINxvbuSU1cGlY>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 01:00:53 -0000
Thank you Adrian for the Shepherd work. All the comments are accepted. We will post the 09 version as soon as possible, as the draft is going to be expired soon. Detailed reply could be found in-line. Thanks Qilei 原始邮件 发件人:AdrianFarrel 收件人:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org; 抄送人:'CCAMP'; 日 期 :2022年05月06日 05:34 主 题 :RE: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability Oh, and you can remove Section 5. Qilei: well, we will remove this. A -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sent: 05 May 2022 22:23 To: 'draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org' <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org> Cc: 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org> Subject: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability Hi, I have stepped in as document shepherd for this document. Here is my Review based on -08. While you work on these comments and post a new revision, I'll do the shepherd write-up. Thanks, Adrian === Abstract Please expand "LSP" in the Abstract. Qilei: will expand "LSP". --- 1. Please expand OTN, OTU, ODU, and LSP on first use. s/Since the/Because/ Qilei: accepted. --- 2. Not sure that using lettered bullets is necessary. s/Detailed description/Detailed descriptions/ You should probably have a separate entry for TPN in this list. It is probably not important, but I find the use of '5G' to be unfortunately ambiguous given all the work of the 3GPP. Would it be possible to use '5 Gbit/s' throughout the whole document? Qilei: accepted. for the lettered bullets, will replace them with " * ". --- 3.1 Is it clear what "FlexO" is? The term pops up as though the reader is supposed to know it. Qilei: will add some description about FlexO in the section 2. --- In Figure 1 you have +--------+ +--------+ | +-----------+ | | OTN |-----------| OTN | | DXC +-----------+ DXC + | | | | +--------+ +--------+ Is that '+' on the right-hand side intentional? Qilei: well, will fix it. --- 3.4 'TS' is used in this section (and only in this section) without expansion. What does it mean? I think you can... OLD As mentioned above, the OPUCn signal has 20*n 5G tributary slots. NEW As mentioned above, the OPUCn signal has 20*n 5G tributary slots (TSs). END Qilei: accepted. --- 4.1 Section 3 of RFC7138 describes how to represent G.709 OTUk/ODUk with TE-Links in GMPLS. Similar to that, ODUCn links can also be represented as TE-Links, which can be seen in the Figure 4. I think that is "Figure 3" Qilei: you are right. will fix it. --- 4.2 'LO' and 'HO' are used without explanation Qilei: will expand them. --- 4.2 An example is given in Figure 5 to illustrate the label format Is that "Figure 4"? Qilei: yes, you are right, will fix it.
- [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-cc… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-iet… wang.qilei
- Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-iet… wang.qilei
- Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-iet… Adrian Farrel