Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability

wang.qilei@zte.com.cn Fri, 06 May 2022 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0FC15949E; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zIw3vtrhwcDU; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A590C14F744; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxlzmapp06.zte.com.cn ([10.5.230.252]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 246102Sp022875; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.qilei@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (szxlzmapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid16; Fri, 6 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 09:00:21 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b03627473250ac-bf49d
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202205060900212890011@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <000101d860c7$d3f02a00$7bd07e00$@olddog.co.uk>
References: 000101d860c7$d3f02a00$7bd07e00$@olddog.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wang.qilei@zte.com.cn
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, rvaliveti@infinera.com, zhenghaomian@huawei.com, huubatwork@gmail.com, sergio.belotti@nokia.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 246102Sp022875
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 62747340.002 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1651798848/4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk/62747340.002/10.30.14.239/[10.30.14.239]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<wang.qilei@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 62747340.002/4KvXLS6PTZz5B0xk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/4aukjkXJacNaQNINxvbuSU1cGlY>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 01:00:53 -0000

Thank you Adrian for the Shepherd work. All the comments are accepted. We will post the 09 version as soon as possible, as the draft is going to be expired soon.


Detailed reply could be found in-line.






Thanks


Qilei











原始邮件



发件人:AdrianFarrel
收件人:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org;
抄送人:'CCAMP';
日 期 :2022年05月06日 05:34
主 题 :RE: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability


Oh, and you can remove Section 5.

Qilei: well, we will remove this.


A
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>  
Sent: 05 May 2022 22:23
To: 'draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org' 
<draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org> 
Cc: 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org> 
Subject: Document shepherd review of
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability
 
Hi,
 
I have stepped in as document shepherd for this document. Here is my
Review based on -08.
 
While you work on these comments and post a new revision, I'll do the
shepherd write-up.
 
Thanks,
Adrian
 
===
 
Abstract
 
Please expand "LSP" in the Abstract.
 Qilei: will expand "LSP".
---
 
1.
 
Please expand OTN, OTU, ODU, and LSP on first use.
 
s/Since the/Because/
 Qilei: accepted.
---
 
2.
 
Not sure that using lettered bullets is necessary.
 
s/Detailed description/Detailed descriptions/
 
You should probably have a separate entry for TPN in this list.
 
It is probably not important, but I find the use of '5G' to be
unfortunately ambiguous given all the work of the 3GPP. Would it be
possible to use '5 Gbit/s' throughout the whole document?
 


Qilei: accepted.

for the lettered bullets, will replace them with " * ".


---
 
3.1
 
Is it clear what "FlexO" is? The term pops up as though the reader is
supposed to know it.

Qilei: will add some description about FlexO in the section 2.


---
 
In Figure 1 you have
 
    +--------+           +--------+
    |        +-----------+        |
    | OTN    |-----------| OTN    |
    | DXC    +-----------+ DXC    +
    |        |           |        |
    +--------+           +--------+
 
Is that '+' on the right-hand side intentional?

Qilei: well, will fix it.


---
 
3.4
 
'TS' is used in this section (and only in this section) without  
expansion. What does it mean? I think you can...
 
OLD
   As mentioned above, the OPUCn signal has 20*n 5G tributary slots.
NEW
   As mentioned above, the OPUCn signal has 20*n 5G tributary slots
   (TSs).
END
 


Qilei: accepted.

---
 
4.1
 
   Section 3 of RFC7138 describes how to represent G.709 OTUk/ODUk with
   TE-Links in GMPLS.  Similar to that, ODUCn links can also be
   represented as TE-Links, which can be seen in the Figure 4.
 
I think that is "Figure 3"



Qilei: you are right. will fix it.
---
 
4.2
 
'LO' and 'HO' are used without explanation
 


Qilei: will expand them.

---
 
4.2
 
   An example is given in Figure 5 to illustrate the label format
 
Is that "Figure 4"?

Qilei: yes, you are right, will fix it.