IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Status of draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-02.txt

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Wed, 17 September 2003 22:56 UTC

Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:57:41 +0000
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155023315AB@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: 'Kireeti Kompella' <kireeti@juniper.net>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Cc: "'v.sharma@ieee.org'" <v.sharma@ieee.org>, CCAMP <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, "Ronald P. Bonica" <Ronald.P.Bonica@wcom.com>, Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>, Eric Mannie <eric_mannie@hotmail.com>, Alexey Zinin <azinin@psg.com>
Subject: RE: Status of draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-02.txt
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:56:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

> Hi Bert,
> 
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > WG chairs... what is the status according to you?
> 
> According to me, this document is ready for publication as an
> Informational RFC as a product of the CCAMP WG.  I'm not sure what the
> last action by the chairs was (i.e., did we send it to the IESG?),

Not that I know (or at least I do not remember).

> but we did a WG Last Call, and the comments recevied were incorporated
> by the authors.
> 
And the doc has now expired and no longer exists?

> I will formally send a request to the IESG to publish this doc.
> 
You do such by sending a request for publication (with intended status)
to your primary AD (so me in this case) and copy iesg-secreytary@ietf.org
so that they can put it into ID-tracker and so that it does not fall
through the cracks.

Bert
> Kireeti.
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status