Re: [CCAMP] blacklink MIB
"Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com> Tue, 20 March 2012 22:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ED221F84B3 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BIkpMpF8oa4 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E221F851C for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ggalimbe@cisco.com; l=1363; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1332283145; x=1333492745; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=1bm/5rXUnyRig2psIMqVgmPTcknJR1eiFJHDiWFF9wg=; b=mR7UETB6p+sGdFuLVszfdklsr6DEFoSSfhO0FakktrPc8xnPEZXcpMGf 9LJLk2lTy6NMJ1fI7t1LsqwMnfa7cktGzAzaMGnY98m/26AqrKaJ2WVeT dJYeFnJcqKAjf/1j9RNZPKpMp1tdkj9r4gzOq2Y0lMDsNgcsF0rmevSp9 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAP4FaU+Q/khM/2dsb2JhbABEtmSBB4IJAQEBBAEBAQ8BHQoxAwsMBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgEmHwkIAQEEEwgah2gLl2OfJASNX4I/YwSkHoFogmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,621,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="132878264"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2012 22:39:02 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2KMd2k9018738; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:39:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-108.cisco.com ([144.254.74.83]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:39:02 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:38:58 +0100
Message-ID: <81F0A11BDDDF6C40B3D3F275DA15086E06C72E90@XMB-AMS-108.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <001b01cd0603$9d1303b0$d7390b10$@olddog.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] blacklink MIB
Thread-Index: Ac0GAzZd0B/i+mjRQEymmXa11VRdkgA5R5jQ
References: <001b01cd0603$9d1303b0$d7390b10$@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2012 22:39:02.0055 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F77EB70:01CD06EA]
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] blacklink MIB
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:39:06 -0000
Hi Adrian, Thanks for the feedbacks. You are right the SNMP MIB draft can be and extension of RFC 3591 developed in atommib. We presented one year ago together with draft-kunze-g-698-2-management-control-framework. The framework deal with the Optical impairments in Control plane and management plane. So the reasons we asked to work on it in ccamp were: - not to separate the MIB draft from the framework - the fact that in ccamp there are many expert in optical matters (see WSON activity) And this can lead to good cross-feedback We didn't have strong opposition to stay in ccamp even if we are open to discuss The migration to OPSAWG. Our preference is to stay in ccamp due to the subject affinities. Best Regards, Gabriele & All. -----Original Message----- From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 19 March 2012 20:08 To: 'CCAMP' Subject: [CCAMP] blacklink MIB Hi, I think I understand why blacklink falls under your care, but the MIB module appears to be an extension to RFC 3591. Why is a MIB for a data plane optical interface thing in CCAMP and not in OPSAWG (now that atommib is closed)? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] blacklink MIB Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] blacklink MIB Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)