Non-member submission from [Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>]
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 14 February 2007 21:15 UTC
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHRTN-0004Ug-1w for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:15:29 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HHRTA-0004jY-8k for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:15:29 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1HHRGl-000PDQ-GC for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:02:27 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [212.23.3.142] (helo=rutherford.zen.co.uk) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1HHRGg-000PD0-2C for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:02:24 +0000
Received: from [88.96.235.142] (helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHRGc-0002X1-Vq for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:02:19 +0000
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([217.158.132.46] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:02:16 +0000
Message-ID: <042701c7507b$57762af0$0d01a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Non-member submission from [Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>]
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:46:44 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2007 21:02:17.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[68EE5DC0:01C7507B]
X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [88.96.235.142]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
> To: sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy), hartmans-ietf@mit.edu > From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> > Subject: Re: Security considerations with > draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-restart-ext-07 > Cc: adrian@olddog.co.uk, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, dbrungard@att.com, > derek@ihtfp.com, sandy@tislabs.com > In-Reply-To: <20070214183140.513D73F47E@pecan.tislabs.com> > References: <tsltzxzp0er.fsf@cz.mit.edu> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > At 01:31 PM 2/14/2007 -0500, Sandy Murphy wrote: >> >I think we may need a conference call on this. What times would work >> >for people next week? >> >>I saw this a bit late at NANOG and was debating how to respond to the >>approach >>Sam suggested. And never replied, myself. I saw no other replies, and it >>is >>now the middle of "next week". Did I miss the replies? Is a conference >>call >>still a good idea? >> >>--Sandy > > No, there haven't yet been replies. > > Adrian has been busy becoming a grandfather (relative to my > experience, a case of "young kids having grand-babies"). He > is just back from this exhausting but successful experience. > > I read Sam's proposal, but don't know how to respond and > thus was waiting to give Adrian time to look at it in detail. > > Ross
- Non-member submission from [Ross Callon <rcallon@… Adrian Farrel