[CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 02 September 2015 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026731B508C; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egtKY9pAFBn1; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D0F1B45D9; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t82K4Aep031753 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:04:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-170-237-80.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.237.80] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <55E75637.9030800@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:04:07 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/BUS-JpaIaP_H5Xu_5wGPodbHiDs>
Subject: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:04:21 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: 9 Sep 2015 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard One thing I'd like to check, and I suspect this pokes at a conversation that has already happened (as hinted in the acknowledgements section): The discussion of managements systems having to deal with a 64 bit wavelength label caught my eye. This is an RFC3471 section 3.2.1.1 label isn't it? That document shows wavelength labels as 32 bit things. Has something updated 3471 to say to expect a multiple of 32 bits, and not 32 bits specifically? If not, maybe this document would be a good place to do so explicitly, rather than what appears to be fiat at the moment? micro-nit: at the end of the introduction "in that regard" suggests the document updates the work of the ITU-T in some other regard? I suggest simple deleting the phrase.
- [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexi… Robert Sparks
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… julien.meuric
- Re: [CCAMP] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-f… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-ccamp… Robert Sparks
- Re: [CCAMP] [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: dr… Jari Arkko