LMP mib and Sonet-SDH draft mis-alignment

"Shiba, Sidney" <sidney.shiba@fnc.fujitsu.com> Mon, 08 November 2004 17:28 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04291 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:28:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRDKS-0007tI-DO for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 12:29:34 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CRD5A-000HYp-Kw for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:13:32 +0000
Received: from [168.127.0.56] (helo=fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CRD4y-000HXX-IS for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:13:20 +0000
Received: (from root@localhost) by fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id iA8HDDWo020943 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:13:13 -0600
Received: from UNKNOWN (167.254.105.50, claiming to be "FNCNMP01.fnc.fujitsu.com") by fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com 00I0co4F; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:13:12 CST
X-Scanned: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:13:10 -0600 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.32 2004072311 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by FNCNMP01.fnc.fujitsu.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id iA8HDAMw013814 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:13:10 -0600
Received: from rchemx01.fnc.net.local (167.254.101.101) by smtp.fnc.net.local 00kG7hP8; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:13:09 CST
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C4C5B6.3834778C"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Subject: LMP mib and Sonet-SDH draft mis-alignment
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:13:09 -0600
Message-ID: <7CA873794E52904EAA980A074B0767790DF68A@rchemx01.fnc.net.local>
Thread-Topic: LMP mib and Sonet-SDH draft mis-alignment
Thread-Index: AcTFtjgzJQpp1sdYSc+mbTeTtmzgNA==
From: "Shiba, Sidney" <sidney.shiba@fnc.fujitsu.com>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.64
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176

All,

Can somebody let me know if there is a mib being specified for the draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-04.txt.
Currently, the draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-10.txt still have the definitions for SONET/SDH in it.

lmpLinkVerifyTransportMechanism OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX        BITS {
                     -- All encoding types:
                     payload(0),
                     -- SONET/SDH encoding type:
                     dccSectionOverheadBytes(1),
                     dccLineOverheadBytes(2),
                     j0Trace(3),
                     j1Trace(4),
                     j2Trace(5)
                 }

While, the bit definition in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-04.txt don't match for J1 and J2.
See below:

        0x0001 : Reserved
        0x0002 DCCS: Test Message over the Section/RS DCC
        0x0004 DCCL: Test Message over the Line/MS DCC
        0x0008 J0-trace: J0 Section Trace Correlation
  -->   0x0010:  Reserved
  -->   0x0020:  Reserved
  -->   0x0040 J1-trace: J1 Path Trace Correlation
  -->   0x0080 J2-trace: J2 Section Trace Correlation

Are both documents correct and if so, how the Verify Transport Mechanism should
be interpreted for J1 and J2?

Thanks,

Sidney Shiba