[CCAMP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 08 April 2019 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78EF1203B3; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 23:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <155470422974.18254.18244907474058589870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 23:17:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/D9QytDskhNE7zbL-4Dh3zK-wqe8>
Subject: [CCAMP] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 06:17:10 -0000

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

— Section 3.1 —

      When the Availability TLV is included, it MUST be present along
      with the Ethernet Bandwidth Profile TLV.

I had to read this a couple of time to get it.  I suggest that this reads a bit better:

NEW
When the Availability TLV is included,  the Ethernet Bandwidth Profile TLV
MUST also be included.
END

There’s also a nit in the description of “Availability”: “1and” is missing a space.

— Section 3.2 —

   When a node receives Availability TLVs which mixed of zero index and
   non-zero index,

Nit: “...TLVs with a mix of zero index...”

Nit later in the section: change “there're are” to “there are”.