Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4427 (1835)

[Vishwas Manral <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eric,

Thats correct. I am ok with the suggestions you mention (which is what
I am saying too).

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Eric Gray<[e-mail]> wrote:
> Vishwas,
>
>        The errata system is somewhat erratic.  Changes that are not
> absolutely necessary tend to discredit/devalue the utility of the
> (already easy to ignore) errata process.
>
>        If we had to make a change (to clarify what is understandably
> not very clear) it would be better to reduce the redundancy.  I'd
> offer as a possibly better "fix" -
>
>        Replace "(M, N > 1, N >= M)" with "(N >= M > 1)"
>
> - which is what I think you're now suggesting as well.
>
>        But that brings us back to the point - is this change really
> necessary at all?
>
> --
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vishwas Manral [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 10:59 AM
> To: Eric Gray
> Cc: RFC Errata System; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4427 (1835)
> Importance: High
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Now I see it that way. However I got confused as "," is a seperator
> both for multiple conditions as well as multiple elements in a
> condition.
>
> The best way would be to put it would be only one condition (same for
> the other Errata):
>
> N >= M > 1.
>
> Thanks,
> Vishwas
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Eric Gray<[e-mail]> wrote:
>> In this case, the additional "M > 1" is redundant, since the parenthesized
>> statement starts by stating that _both_ M and N are reater than 1 - i.e. -
>> "M, N > 1" equates to "M > 1, N > 1"
>>
>> The text referred to is correct as is.
>>
>> --
>> Eric
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:03 PM
>> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4427 (1835)
>>
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4427,
>> "Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4427&eid=1835
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Vishwas Manral <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Section: 6.3
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> 6.3. M:N (M, N > 1, N >= M) Protection
>>
>>
>>   M:N protection has N working LSPs/spans carrying normal traffic and M
>>   protection LSP/span that may carry extra-traffic.
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> 6.3. M:N (M, N > 1, N >= M > 1) Protection
>>
>>
>>   M:N protection has N working LSPs/spans carrying normal traffic and M
>>   protection LSP/span that may carry extra-traffic.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> M > 1 is added
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC4427 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-06)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
>> Publication Date    : March 2006
>> Author(s)           : E. Mannie, Ed., D. Papadimitriou, Ed.
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>