Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4873 (1797)

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

As a co-author, I concur that this Errata is valid and should be
verified.  As mentioned in the errata, the CCAMP WG will discuss this
issue and may request that additional text be added to the errata.

Lou

On 6/23/2009 5:46 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4873,
> "GMPLS Segment Recovery".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4873&eid=1797
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: David McWalter <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 5.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The collection of SRROs is controlled via the
> segment-recording-desired flag in the SESSION_ATTRIBUTE object.  This
> flag MAY be set even when SEROs are not used.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> <New text to be decided by ccamp>
> 
> Notes
> -----
> No request was made to IANA to assign a value for the segment-recording-desired flag.
> 
> Possible solutions are under discussion on the ccamp list (22 June 2009)
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg10205.html
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4873 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : GMPLS Segment Recovery
> Publication Date    : May 2007
> Author(s)           : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, D. Papadimitriou, A. Farrel
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> 
>