Re: Last call complete on Advertisement of inter-AS TE links
Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com> Thu, 10 April 2008 01:40 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE70F3A6BA3 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id isN11XR832eV for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B24D3A6807 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JjldH-000F21-RQ for ccamp-data@psg.com; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:31:19 +0000
Received: from [61.144.161.53] (helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mach@huawei.com>) id 1JjldD-000F11-QM for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:31:18 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JZ300HPE5JV9V@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:31:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from M55527 ([10.111.12.186]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JZ300EGX5JUOX@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:31:07 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:31:06 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Last call complete on Advertisement of inter-AS TE links
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: CCAMP List <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Message-id: <200804100931061910652@huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Foxmail 6, 10, 201, 20 [cn]
Content-type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <079701c889ec$22702080$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe> <C71840B5-D198-4EA8-B132-0EFD68F54FD8@redback.com> <029d01c89a5b$304133a0$0300a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Hi Adrian and all, Thanks for the review and comment. I will update and resubmit the I-Ds ASAP. Best regards, Mach Chen On 2008-04-10, at 00:06:32 Adrian Farrel wrote: >Hi, > >The last call completed. Given the high level of review and discussion in >the past and the relatively small size of the I-Ds, I'm not surprised that >we only got a couple of comments during last call. > >Mach, can you make the changes to the I-D to satisfy Acee's comments on the >OSPF draft, and check to see if there is any similar language in the IS-IS >draft? One point... > >Where he suggests alternative text for "TE Router ID", I think this is fine, >but it would be helpful if you retained "TE Router ID" in brackets to give >the extra information. > >Thanks, >Adrian >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Acee Lindem" <acee@redback.com> >To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> >Cc: "OSPF List" <ospf@ietf.org>; "CCAMP List" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> >Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:46 PM >Subject: Re: [OSPF] CCAMP last call on advertisement of inter-AS TE links > > >>I can't speak for the OSPF WG as a whole, but I have reviewed the subject >>document and am very happy to see that the suggestion to use separate >>inter-AS LSA types has been incorporated. I have no further technical >>comments on the document and trust that the ccamp WG has verified that >>this information encoding meets the TE requirements. The usage described >>in sections 2.2 and 2.3 seem reasonable to me. >> >> I have the following editorial comments: >> >> 1. Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.2 - Both of these say "Use of the TE Router >> ID is RECOMMENDED." I believe these should be respectively replaced by >> "Use of the TE Router Address as specified in the Router Address TLV >> [OSPF-TE] is RECOMMENDED." and "Use of the TE Router IPv6 Address as >> specified in the IPv6 Router Address as specified in the IPv6 Router >> Address TLV [OSPF-V3-TE] is RECOMMENDED." >> 2. Section 3.2.1 states "This is because... that may operate in a >> different address space;". If they are using a different address space on >> the link between the ASes, then I'd expect there to be problems with BGP >> as well :^) I'd suggest: >> "Given that OSPF is an IGP and should only be utilized between >> routers in the same routing domain, the OSPF specific Link ID and >> Neighbor ID sub-TLVs are not applicable to inter-AS links.". >> 3. You may want to expand some acronyms on their first use. For >> example, "AS Boundary Router (ASBR)", "Link State Advertisement (LSA)" >> and >> "Path Computation Element (PCE)". >> 4. [OSPFV3] is listed to as both a Normative and Informative reference. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> On Mar 19, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> You may recall providing useful review and feedback on >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas- >>> te-extension-02.txt >>> >>> The authors believe that they have taken on board all the comments >>> received >>> from the OSPF working group and have updated the draft accordingly. >>> >>> >>> CCAMP is holding a three week working group last call on this I-D along >>> with >>> its IS-IS partner document: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-isis-interas- >>> te-extension-00.txt >>> >>> These documents describe how to advertise the TE links that connect an >>> AS to >>> the outside world within the AS's IGP. As the drafts are at pains to >>> point >>> out, there is no proposal to advertise the TE information more widely >>> (such >>> as to other ASes). >>> >>> The last call will end at 12 noon BST on April 9th 2008. >>> >>> Please send your comments to the CCAMP list or direct to the CCAMP >>> chairs. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Adrian and Deborah >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> OSPF@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >> > > >