IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP

Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com> Sun, 07 March 2004 13:00 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA17177 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 08:00:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AzxtR-0005Ej-00 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 08:00:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Azxsc-00057Q-00 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 07:59:43 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Azxs0-0004zm-00 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 07:59:04 -0500
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AzxeH-000Ifn-Eq for ccamp-data@psg.com; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 12:44:53 +0000
Received: from [65.205.166.188] (helo=jera.movaz.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Azxe6-000Ide-5g for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 12:44:42 +0000
Received: from lb-laptop.movaz.com (kenaz.atlanta.movaz.com [172.16.8.184]) by jera.movaz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACE85F6C; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:44:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040307074358.04080350@mo-ex1>
X-Sender: lb@mo-ex1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 07:44:19 -0500
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>
Subject: Re: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <00c701c401de$af6a8e20$ece325da@Puppy>
References: <00c701c401de$af6a8e20$ece325da@Puppy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

Yes on all.

At 06:46 AM 3/4/2004 -0500, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>All,
>
>At the CCAMP meeting today we discussed making several drafts working 
>group items. Can you
>please express your opinion (yes/no) on whether each of the following 
>drafts is ready to
>become a CCAMP working group draft.
>
>Feel free to express yes with reservations. If you have reservations or 
>objections, please
>express them on the list. if you need anonymity for your comments then 
>please filter them
>through the chairs.
>
>Silence will be taken as meaning nothing, so please say what you think.
>
>GMPLS Signaling Procedure For Egress Control
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-control-01.txt 
>
>
>Generic Tunnel Tracing Protocol (GTTP) Specification
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt 
>
>
>RSVP-TE Extensions in support of End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt 
>
>
>GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00.txt 
>
>
>Thank you,
>Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email