IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] 答复: Update to 07 version//WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-04

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Tue, 06 December 2016 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD3612984A; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:50:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8QgtC5oKHNA; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D1C129EBF; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DCA41134; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 08:50:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.33) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 08:50:13 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.105]) by SZXEMA415-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:50:00 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@nokia.com>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.authors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update to 07 version//WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-04
Thread-Index: AdIvT/fMg5H5PExfQNKZVeQMOA+UBQgTCg1w
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 08:49:59 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8AAB1E294@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438DA5DAE@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438DA5DAE@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.162.94]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8AAB1E294SZXEMA504MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.58467BC9.000D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.8.105, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 43062949f167244968cc1ae2cf281fc1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/LQaE3cULlIntCO615kIZH3pkres>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: Update to 07 version//WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-04
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 08:50:24 -0000

Hi all,

I think WG Last Call on this draft has been going too long☺ (thanks for the comments), and it is time to move forward for publication.

Just one comment: there is one typo on the newly added text in Abstract, and it could be updated during the IESG process.


- s/ know /known/





Thanks

Fatai

发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Zhenghaomian
发送时间: 2016年10月26日 14:13
收件人: Dieter Beller; draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.authors@ietf.org
抄送: ccamp@ietf.org
主题: [CCAMP] Update to 07 version//答复: Document shepherd write-up re draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-06.txt

Hi Dieter,

Thanks for your review comments, we addressed all the issue proposed and updated as 07 version. On behalf of all the authors, we think this document ready for further processing, thanks.

Best wishes,
Haomian

发件人: Dieter Beller [mailto:Dieter.Beller@nokia.com]
发送时间: 2016年10月7日 19:16
收件人: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext.authors@ietf.org>
抄送: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
主题: Document shepherd write-up re draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-06.txt


Hi authors of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-06.txt,

as part of my document shepherd review, I have the following editorial comments:



The Abstract should be enhanced. It is fairly short. Some text from the

Abstract of RFC7698 could be used. The Abstract should explicitly mention

ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1 (see abstract of RFC7698).



The last paragraph of the Introduction should contain a reference to RFC4203.

It shall also state that this document defines extensions to RFC7580.



Corrections are required in lines 120, 247, and 509.
For your convenience, you can find the necessary corrections and my comments in the attached file
(revision tracking is on).

As stated above, this is all editorial and the technical content is unchanged.


Thanks,
Dieter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email