[CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4920 (4480)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 21 September 2015 05:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD24A1A8ABA for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jF-IG-RVWlry for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866611A8AC7 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C79F2180204; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, asatyana@cisco.com, a-iwata@ah.jp.nec.com, n-fujita@bk.jp.nec.com, gash5107@yahoo.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, zhangfatai@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150921055453.C79F2180204@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:54:53 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/O9beWm-WjPD0vutLs0YecqpymaY>
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4920 (4480)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:55:41 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4920, "Crankback Signaling Extensions for MPLS and GMPLS RSVP-TE". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4920&eid=4480 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Section: 6.2 Original Text ------------- For types 10 and 23, the Value field has the format: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length | IS-IS Area Identifier | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ IS-IS Area Identifier (continued) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Length Length of the actual (non-padded) IS-IS Area Identifier in octets. Valid values are from 2 to 11 inclusive. Corrected Text -------------- For types 10 and 23, the Value field has the format: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Length | IS-IS Area Identifier | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ IS-IS Area Identifier (continued) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Length Length of the actual (non-padded) IS-IS Area Identifier in octets. Valid values are from 1 to 13 inclusive. Notes ----- IS-IS area IDs can vary from 1 to 13 bytes in length (max NSAP length is 20, minus 1 byte for NSEL, minus 6 bytes for SysID). *Noted by Jonathan Hardwick in another document that was using the same data. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4920 (draft-ietf-ccamp-crankback-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Crankback Signaling Extensions for MPLS and GMPLS RSVP-TE Publication Date : July 2007 Author(s) : A. Farrel, Ed., A. Satyanarayana, A. Iwata, N. Fujita, G. Ash Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Common Control and Measurement Plane Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4920 (4480) RFC Errata System
- Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4920 (… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported]… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [CCAMP] [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported]… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported]… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [CCAMP] [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Reported]… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] [Teas] [Isis-wg] [Technical Errata Re… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] [Errata Verified] RFC4920 (4480) RFC Errata System