Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-03.txt Fri, 06 November 2020 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1943A0A86 for <>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:36:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6y2hmi-d3x_d for <>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F59C3A0A85 for <>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 8D3E26621759626A9A88; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:14 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id 0A61a9vP042552; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:09 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (kjyxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid16; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:08 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:36:08 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2b055fa4a888c6932c46
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <>
To: <>
Cc: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: 0A61a9vP042552
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?q?I-D_Action=3Adraft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-?= =?utf-8?q?applicability-03=2Etxt?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:36:22 -0000

Dear CCAMPers,

A new version of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-03 was uploaded, the main changes were listed below:

OTSi/OCh related description is deleted, as they are not in the scope of this draft.

How to apply GMPLS to ODUCn case is out of the scope of this draft, relevant description is pruned out.

Adding some description that the G.709-2020 version does not have impact on the extension indicated in this draft.

Adding some description that the M value of OTUCn-M may not be efficient for deciding which slots are available or not. 

It will be very helpful if anyone of you read this draft, share your comments. Much appreciation.

In addition, a number of authors thought this version could go ahead for LC request during the discussion. If anyone of you has any comments on this, please email us.  




收件人 ;
日 期 :2020年11月02日 09:47
主 题 :[CCAMP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-03.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Applicability of GMPLS for B100G Optical Transport Network
        Authors         : Qilei Wang
                          Radha Valiveti
                          Haomian Zheng
                          Huub van Helvoort
                          Sergio Belotti
    Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-03.txt
    Pages           : 15
    Date            : 2020-11-01

   This document examines the applicability of using current existing
   GMPLS routing and signalling mechanisms to set up ODUk (e.g.,
   ODUflex) LSP over ODUCn links, as defined in the 2016 version of

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

CCAMP mailing list