Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 22 November 2018 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA5012D4E6 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:51:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvqrZpPmBS51 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B45128C65 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (h-39-108.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [213.136.39.108]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6B371AE018C; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:51:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:51:45 +0100
Message-Id: <20181122.085145.922542330572727924.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB5963C5E0E9377B297A4B42BFF0DA0@DB7PR07MB5963.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB7PR07MB596391D5ECE3029E9E8C76A2F0DA0@DB7PR07MB5963.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <20181121.155757.416652512822847337.mbj@tail-f.com> <DB7PR07MB5963C5E0E9377B297A4B42BFF0DA0@DB7PR07MB5963.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/UvVg_ys4xg21NYprO3avWCitGc0>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:51:49 -0000

Hi,

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Thanks Martin!
> 
> I've requested the YANG doctor review for version 05, I'll update the
> requrest to 06.

Thanks.  06 is now posted.


/martin



> 
> Daniele  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> 
> Sent: den 21 november 2018 15:58
> To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We will publish an updated version of the document with Balazs' WGLC
> comments addressed (today or tomorrow).
> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> 
> Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Working group,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > The last call is now concluded. I take the lack of comments as a "we 
> > already discussed a lot this draft during its life as WG document" and 
> > hence proceed with the request for publication.
> > 
> > Even if among the authors we have a huge level of competence in YANG 
> > modelling we'll request for a YANG doctors review as a pair of fresh 
> > eyes is in any case helpful.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Daniele
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > From: CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
> > Sent: den 7 november 2018 12:18
> > To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [CCAMP] WG last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Working group,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks to the fast IPR replies from the authors we're ready to start a 
> > two weeks working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-05.
> > 
> > The last call ends on Wednesday November 21st . Please send you 
> > comments to the CCAMP mailing list.
> > 
> > Also comments along the lines of "I've reviewed the draft and believe 
> > it's ready for publication" are valuable.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Authors, please threat pending comments as part of the last call ones.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > All the IPR declarations from authors and contributors have been 
> > collected and can be found in the history of the document:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/history
> > /
> > 
> > Please note that no IPR has been disclosed against the document. 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Daniele, Fatai, Oscar
> > 
> >  
> >