Re: [CCAMP] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 06 February 2014 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479771A0516 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:25:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL=1.391, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTChvV1CZpqq for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730581A0426 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:25:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BDI22583; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:25:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:24:40 +0000
Received: from DFWEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.141) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:25:22 +0000
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.193]) by dfweml704-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.202]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:25:13 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: FW: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPIsanCaKL64/jmE61DIOCfZvWv5qo2gWQ
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:25:12 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729BB7080@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729BB6A6F@dfweml706-chm.china.huawei.com> <52F2C375.5000009@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <52F2C375.5000009@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.139.83]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E1729BB7080dfweml706chmchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:25:36 -0000

Hi,

This summarizes the changes made since WG LC:

- All abbreviations are spelled out before its first usage (general).
- Adding a paragraph that clarifies the relationship between this draft and GEN-Encode (in the introduction)
- Dropped the use of a new top-level TLV (Generic Node Attribute TLV). Instead the Node Attribute TLV (existing) was used. 
- In Section 5.2, added a text that deals with malformed TLV's: 
       "In case where the new sub-TLVs or their attendant encodings are  
       malformed, the proper action would be to log the problem and ignore  
       just the sub-TLVs in GMPLS path computations rather than ignoring  
       the entire LSA."  
                        
- Security Section added: 
       "For general security aspects relevant to Generalized Multiprotocol  
       Label Switching (GMPLS)-controlled networks, please refer to  
       [RFC5920]."
- IANA Consideration Section, suggested type-values were specified for the new TLV's introduced. 
- Many editorials.

Attached is the diff marked between 05 and 07. 

Thanks,
Young
                       

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:04 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt


Young,

Can you summarize the changes that have been made since WG LC?

Thank you,
Lou

On 2/5/2014 4:57 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
> 
> Hi Lou, 
> 
> This draft has passed WG's chair's go-ahead stage, ready for IESG evaluation. 
> 
> Regards,
> Young
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:56 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : OSPF-TE Extensions for General Network Element Constraints
>         Authors         : Fatai Zhang
>                           Young Lee
>                           Jianrui Han
>                           Greg Bernstein
>                           Yunbin Xu
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 13
> 	Date            : 2014-02-05
> 
> Abstract:
>    Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) can be used to
>    control a wide variety of technologies including packet switching
>    (e.g., MPLS), time-division (e.g., SONET/SDH, Optical Transport
>    Network (OTN)), wavelength (lambdas), and spatial switching (e.g.,
>    incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). In some of these
>    technologies, network elements and links may impose additional
>    routing constraints such as asymmetric switch connectivity, non-
>    local label assignment, and label range limitations on links. This
>    document describes Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol
>    extensions to support these kinds of constraints under the control
>    of GMPLS.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>