Re: [CCAMP] (Resuming) Poll on OAM related drafts to ccamp wg documents

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 11 February 2010 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AB43A7166 for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:25:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5Ta2S+BB5nB for <ccamp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DD23A6FF9 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.104.75.131] (62-50-199-249.client.stsn.net [62.50.199.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D50CD4052; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:26:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B73BF39.7080301@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:26:33 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
References: <4B718C44.90001@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B718C44.90001@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: CCAMP WG <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] (Resuming) Poll on OAM related drafts to ccamp wg documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:25:26 -0000

All,

since I'm a co-author of draft-bellagamba- I obviously support
that one, but I'd like say that I also support draf-kern-

So "yes/support to both"

/Loa



Lou Berger wrote:
> All,
> 
> The authors of the drafts have stated that they are ready for this
> poll to resume.  Therefore:
> 
> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
> ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
> indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
> course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)  Please send
> mail even if you expressed an opinion on the prior poll.
> 
> The documents being polled are:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext
> 
> The poll ends Tuesday February 23.
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [CCAMP] Suspended: poll on making
> draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-01.txt ccamp wg document
> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:07:03 -0500
> From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> To: ccamp@ietf.org
> 
> The document authors have asked that we defer this poll until they make
> some further updates to this document.  The plan will be to re-poll the
> WG once the document authors inform us that the changes have been made.
>   Given recent discussion on the list, I expect that this poll will take
> place together with the other technology specific OAM document,
> draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext.
> 
> Please keep in mind that becoming a WG document does not mean that the
> technical details of a document are frozen.  It does mean that the
> working group becomes the authoritative body for technical content,
> i.e., WG consensus drives a WG document while author consensus drives an
> individual document.
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 11/23/2009 5:20 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> This is to start a two week poll on making
>> draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-01.txt a ccamp working group
>> document. Send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support" or
>> "no/do not support".
>>
>> The poll ends Monday, Dec. 7, 2009.
>>
>> Deborah
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

-- 


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                              +46 767 72 92 13