Re: [CCAMP] radio-link and carrier-termination iana interface types

Hi Amy

I thought that this could have been an addition to RFC 7224: IANA Interface Type YANG Module. I can understand now that this model is considered just as a reflection of the IF-MIB interface types and is intended to be updated only when a new interface type is added in IF-MIB. In the case of RLT and CT interface types, we have two interface types introduced in the Microwave Radio Link YANG Data Model but not yet required to be used in some MIB. So they remain unregistered in IANA. 
On the other hand, in NETCONF/RESTCONF, no specific ifType numerical value is required and the radio-link-terminal and carrier-termination identities specified in  ietf-microwave-types are adequate for this purpose.
Thanks for your answers.

Theodoros Kallimanis
Principal Engineer (Systems & SW)
Department SSD
______________________________________
Intracom Telecom
19.7 km Markopoulou Ave., Peania, GR 19002
Building A3, 2nd floor
t:   +30 2106671961
f:   +30 2106671446
m: +30 6941636679
tks@intracom-telecom.com
www.intracom-telecom.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Yemin (Amy) [mailto:amy.yemin@huawei.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:01 AM
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>; Kallimanis Theodoros <tks@intracom-telecom.com>; ccamp@ietf.org; jonas.ahlberg@ericsson.com; Xi.Li@neclab.eu; daniela.spreafico@nokia.com; Marko.Vaupotic@avianet.com
Subject: RE: [CCAMP] radio-link and carrier-termination iana interface types

Hi Theodoros,

I discussed with serveral people at the IETF week, the answer is the same as Tom gave.
We cannot use a YANG model to ask for IANA registry for MIB. 
As YANG is normally used by NETCONF/RESTCONF, MIB is used by SNMP. 
If there's interest on MIB, another draft should be sumbitted and ask for the registry. 

BR,
Amy
________________________________________
发件人: tom petch [ietfc@btconnect.com]
发送时间: 2018年11月1日 21:10
收件人: Kallimanis Theodoros; ccamp@ietf.org; jonas.ahlberg@ericsson.com; Yemin (Amy); Xi.Li@neclab.eu; daniela.spreafico@nokia.com; Marko.Vaupotic@avianet.com
主题: Re: [CCAMP] radio-link and carrier-termination iana interface types

---- Original Message -----
From: "Kallimanis Theodoros" <tks@intracom-telecom.com>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>; <jonas.ahlberg@ericsson.com>; <amy.yemin@huawei.com>; <Xi.Li@neclab.eu>; <daniela.spreafico@nokia.com>; <Marko.Vaupotic@avianet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:27 AM

Hello

I would like to ask a question regarding to ietf-microwave-types module.

For radio-link-terminal and carrier-termination, is it expected that these new interface-types will be also registered at IANA Interface Type registry for  IANAifType-MIB?

<tp>

The strict answer is no, they will not be added to the registry.  They are only added when the IANA Cosiderations asks IANA to do so and this I-D makes no such request.

If such a request were made, then they would be added both to the IANA-maintained MIB Module and to the IANA-maintained YANG  module.

I did think of this a year ago and thought them too specific to CCAMP, worth putting into a YANG module but not inflicting them on the IETF at large, but do not think this ever got discussed on the WG list.

Tom Petch

BEST REGARDS

Theodoros Kallimanis
Principal Engineer (Systems & SW)

Department SSD
______________________________________
Intracom Telecom
19.7 km Markopoulou Ave., Peania, GR 19002

Building A3, 2nd floor
t:   +30 2106671961
f:   +30 2106671446
m: +30 6941636679
 <mailto:tks@intracom-telecom.com> tks@intracom-telecom.com  <http://www.intracom-telecom.com/> www.intracom-telecom.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>