[CCAMP] Discussion of tuning Routing Area working groups

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 22 August 2014 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16D41A02D2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AefuyTFOErcu for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DE01A0263 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain []) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7MBu0kl011777 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:56:01 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com []) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s7MBtxMv011762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:55:59 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:55:59 +0100
Message-ID: <010301cfbe00$0a56eca0$1f04c5e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac++AAevCjnkehfFSUK0RScEzVSIzA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.158-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.158-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 2KbaSJKwjfToyJCZV0+mCEhEDfw/93BuH181YDtIVarM7zpEspqG/6TY tf9nwiNjbF7poigH+cNw2WXu5+qnAmefQAfaVEc5qvEVAzPSLFz64i5lgawyBGjliw+xvItd82+ ZJoKeNOVXJ2eGl+KMD7cdglkjLwetC3d7vPRaKlGeAiCmPx4NwLTrdaH1ZWqCmBlD3TjdXl76C0 ePs7A07Y6HM5rqDwqtXNkits6XK70FVUspY4s4GF/bSTkpLH967I51oC0RKj6P8uPnFqnElg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/XcQaHCfwKAaYShkkkC6J_5cWIQI
Subject: [CCAMP] Discussion of tuning Routing Area working groups
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:56:06 -0000


Just wanted to bring to your attention that there is a discussion on the Routing
Discussion mailing list about possible ways to restructure a few of the working
groups in the Routing Area. This concerns CCAMP as the discussion relates to
where to put work concerning TE Architecture, RSVP-TE, and technology-specific

You can subscribe to the list and see the message archive at

Please join in if you have an opinion.