[CCAMP] Question RE: draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane-framework
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sat, 06 March 2010 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643663A8BD2; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:06:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eNOxD+kR2tV; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com (mail-bw0-f222.google.com [209.85.218.222]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037103A8982; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so1786276bwz.28 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:06:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dVuptVswlFYKI9bRgMOMlUI/Ubi8t4WsLfmn+DmqeBM=; b=rMhM8HUh9XFyMa+OW/bzopQUhbTAAbza9XDe1LmVQb3v3UkIfDViHSv32Nt1wSSbIu KrgUdPjBKKkHMz5+RGAb6rnKUaiScXZs46c631jmrByeaM0tabXzR0rw7Cp8OCG07je2 66sItg3lSZtbzz6NlIQNXgk2B5HbRrQP6hI7c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=v9CHK2yseHmWkC+MfR1LF5AVymjXCQALCb6UlA7xo3w/qOnVyuUY8jyDMgB/jgSCJV LkmvmgoEP6EZkhHpjfMPkpMEnJZGD4ouxeSMtRvABDVsWdBMRTRoF67LBONuA0beRLhB ECa+MVd5iNeYSbwpDXhOdeDJMYm3Hy7PfFJes=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.26.198 with SMTP id f6mr2282137bkc.13.1267909607390; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:06:46 -0800
Message-ID: <787be2781003061306u348722e7v47c52756adb92f03@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa.andersson@ericsson.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, lufang@cisco.com, nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-tp@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000325554b2ec1b4400481283519"
Subject: [CCAMP] Question RE: draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane-framework
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:06:51 -0000
Dear Editors, Authors and All, I've a question about portraying PW sublayer and LDP control plane in Figures 1 and 2 of the document. Though Section 5 differentiates SS-PW from MS-PW, mentions differences between S-PE and T-PE, the graphical depictions of the MPLS-TP Control Plane portray PW and LDP sublayers as single segment, end-to-end entities. If MS-PW is not outside of the scope of the document, as I couldn't find that being stated in the text, would it be proper that the MPLS-TP Control Plane Reference Model reflect the fact that MS-PW being switched at S-PEs (even if PW Label remains the same)? Regards, Greg