Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01

"Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dieter.beller@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1AC1200B7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 04:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YXe3eDliPMJ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 04:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96793120033 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 04:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pf5/7NrFQzJl7v0sFz0N57+pziL4NKUVYGp61/su9Mo=; b=SXkE4lfMad2XXeZBCKG8DV6s0URra03OXEXXxdxQo7sele83a/4GqIfph8upDB/wwP3kX34xw4/717XFj2WqQjZw6cKmkW/txOFuC4iZBhqgkENFZZs0oSHMhimcXLvO/93n9OhaijY1lARLB+7vNKy8BhsbxzkpGTh0FMrRiBY=
Received: from DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.136.21) by DB7PR07MB5879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.177.193.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.11; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:25:10 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f0f8:6e4e:34c0:6da9]) by DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f0f8:6e4e:34c0:6da9%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.007; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:25:10 +0000
From: "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
CC: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
Thread-Index: AQHU6g/in1DgGsI+TZaZNiPisf8ojg==
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:25:10 +0000
Message-ID: <ffb50484-c6b2-9924-987e-24c6661d7989@nokia.com>
References: <VI1PR07MB50409E6F464C786A9CCAE608F0550@VI1PR07MB5040.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <091501d4e948$a188c800$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7701_1554213204_5CA36954_7701_2_7_ffc8ad41-1454-0a3e-dcf3-633f03bd451b@orange.com> <014401d4e971$8e2a4c60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D10E04D@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D10E04D@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [131.228.32.167]
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
x-clientproxiedby: MR2P264CA0036.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:500::24) To DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:5:31::21)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dieter.beller@nokia.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-subswitch: [CCAMP]; [CCAMP]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 13ea4463-489e-4151-41b4-08d6b827080e
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB5879;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB5879:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB5879ECDF5F02E295982E1066E2570@DB7PR07MB5879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0996D1900D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(478600001)(105586002)(6486002)(8676002)(6116002)(99286004)(53546011)(6306002)(31686004)(6512007)(93886005)(76176011)(81166006)(68736007)(25786009)(7736002)(6246003)(36756003)(4326008)(6506007)(65826007)(229853002)(106356001)(3846002)(8936002)(81156014)(186003)(14454004)(966005)(58126008)(31696002)(71200400001)(26005)(102836004)(386003)(71190400001)(54906003)(486006)(5660300002)(97736004)(53936002)(6436002)(316002)(2906002)(11346002)(66066001)(446003)(476003)(65806001)(65956001)(86362001)(2616005)(305945005)(256004)(52116002)(6916009)(64126003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB5879; H:DB7PR07MB4745.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: q2VNAvAO738csYerNj8GkBj4uEBtoz+OfMyCc9z0seUoEZ8NI4ZuR6RBx8PNhVdLVSt4HyymGlHRliLyaeAxh6heHp2a42dxlLsd0uiuPQ5/n0wb3eH1wc0nrAbDrfr/ZaE9C3C0DLPDERO/sLnOmyGuCmTiq6A6DniIn1XuKrk8ZQOoUjgyGxQMp6QLRx2V4hWd7tCx9AuKsuL18aVMHk93VTmpLqYa8+RlXBy/ToM9NwsFjBUwo34zl75LlWJYzmkFhcIsniQHn0IR8f6sr6sKhs6FkJo9InMOQ+CzG5G3Bi+ru2qai98CL0ngR2/jyFvsbsjI/8BA3JKo2P2f7i8evOswICoveDTtcsHTj8JYd3ljeczoGv1S8jO3zAuBftJ6bQ+0h2OKhHPi4eCsKQi25MmsXw1A33jJtm3jEgE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9BDB40404B6E1D4BA7F7615E21B046FC@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 13ea4463-489e-4151-41b4-08d6b827080e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Apr 2019 11:25:10.4926 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB5879
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/b4uSM3HM59P77pISM23aZ2QkV3k>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:25:16 -0000

Hi Tom,

revised text for section 2.3.1 of the current draft and additional 
subsections describing how the YANG model relates to the ITU-T data 
plane definitions is already in preparation
and will be shared with the WG soon. The plan is to produce a 01-version 
once the draft will have become a WG draft. This 01-version will include 
the revised text. Then, the
01-version of the WG draft will be liaised to ITU-T SG15 for comment. 
This is what has been agreed at a side meeting in Prague among the 
co-authors and folks who were
interested in this subject.


Thanks,
Dieter


On 02.04.2019 18:43, Leeyoung wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Yes, indeed I agree with you. Our intent is to specify the need for the liaison statement, the scope, and terminology in the main text (as you pointed out Section 2.3.1 in the current draft). Our plan is to highlight this section in the very upfront of the revised draft (perhaps 01 of the WG draft-to-be).
>
> Thanks.
> Young
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 11:34 AM
> To: julien.meuric@orange.com
> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-lee-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-01
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <julien.meuric@orange.com>;
> To: "tom petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>;
> Cc: <ccamp@ietf.org>;
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2019 2:53 PM
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Though it may be true from a content perspective, any individual draft
>> has the same administrative status as draft-foo-bar containing a
> stuffed
>> snails recipe. A formal step is required before liaising to another
> SDO,
>> adoption by a WG is the 1st one.
> Indeed (tasty as stuffed snails are).
>
> My thinking is that the liaison should be simpler, plain text, rather than being wrapped as a YANG module, which may or may not encourage readers in the ITU.  It seems to me that it is Section 2.3.1 that needs a response from the ITU and that wrapping that up in a YANG module may make that harder to achieve.  That is what gives me pause.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> On 02/04/2019 13:41, tom petch wrote:
>>> I never see much difference between working on an unadopted I-D and
> an
>>> adopted one so see scope for progress - e.g. Normative References -
> even
>>> if it is not adopted at this moment in time..
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp