Re: [CCAMP] YANG doctor review

Looking at layer0-types, as one who is not a YANG doctor, I see

Introduction makes it clear that this is for optical layer0; Abstract
misses the work 'optical' which I think that it should include.

Module references G.694.1 which I cannot see in the I-D references

Generally, the YANG reference clauses are usually matched by Normative,
not Informative, references

Where section 2.1 provides references for the types and groupings, then
I would see it as essential that those references appear as YANG
reference clauses for the types and groupings; most do not appear in the
YANG module e.g. for vendor identifier, wavelength assignment, layer0
grid type, term type, fec type etc etc

If you think that a reference is needed in section 2.1, and I agree with
you that they are, then logically the same references must appear in the
YANG module since the YANG module is a stand-alone piece of text that
will be divorced from the rest of the I-D/RFC

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniele Ceccarelli"
<daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:56 AM

> WG,

>
> We're requested the YANG doctor review of:
>
>  <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types/>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types/
>
> BR
>
>
>
> Daniele
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>